ReviewHealth affairs (Project Hope)2011
The need for better public health decisions on chemicals released into our environment.
Review in Health affairs (Project Hope), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Implementation: How the Amended Law Has Failed to Protect Vulnerable Populations from Toxic Chemicals in the United States.Environmental science & technology · 2022Pooled it
- A Deep Learning-Based Scoring Framework for Large-Scale Multi-Donor Cardiotoxicity Screening.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- A Deep-Learning-Based Scoring Framework for Large-Scale Multi-donor Cardiotoxicity Screening.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Associations Between Daily-Use Products and Urinary Biomarkers of Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals in Adults of Reproductive Age.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- A science-based agenda for health-protective chemical assessments and decisions: overview and consensus statement.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2023Article
- A Cell-Based Approach to Study the Associations Between Mitochondrial Health, Early Life Exposures, and Consequent Health Outcomes.Frontiers in public health · 2019Article
- QSPR models for predicting log P(liver) values for volatile organic compounds combining statistical methods and domain knowledge.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2012Article
- Toxic environmental chemicals: the role of reproductive health professionals in preventing harmful exposures.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Protecting the health of the public-particularly the most vulnerable groups, such as children-requires rethinking current approaches to reducing environmental risks. We review the evolving understanding of the relationship between exposure to chemicals in the environment and disease, as well as the current state of managing those chemicals. We present recommendations to improve current approaches, including changing the burden of proof so that chemicals are not presumed safe in the absence of scientific data. We also propose modernizing approaches to assessing health risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.