Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21555213›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in biotechnology2011

Fundamentals of methanogenic pathways that are key to the biomethanation of complex biomass.

James G Ferry

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in biotechnology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 192 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Methods for Culturing Anaerobic Microorganisms.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

James G FerryDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16801, United States. jgf3@psu.edu
Pennsylvania State University · US

Funding

PROKARYOTIC CARBONIC ANHYDRASER01GM044661 · NIGMS · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI FERRY, JAMES G · 1992 to 2003
$806k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM044661
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The conversion of biomass to CH4 (biomethanation) involves an anaerobic microbial food chain composed of at least three metabolic groups of which the first two decompose the complex biomass primarily to acetate, formate, and H2. The thermodynamics of these conversions are unfavorable requiring a symbiosis with the CH4-producing group (methanogens) that metabolize the decomposition products to favorable concentrations. The methanogens produce CH4 by two major pathways, conversion of the methyl group of acetate and reduction of CO2 coupled to the oxidation of formate or H2. This review covers recent advances in the fundamental understanding of both methanogenic pathways with the view of stimulating research towards improving the rate and reliability of the overall biomethanation process.

Indexed as

AcetatesAdenosine TriphosphateAnaerobiosisBiomassCarbon DioxideEuryarchaeotaFormatesMethaneMethanosarcinaOxidation-ReductionAcetatesAdenosine TriphosphateCarbon DioxideFormatesMethane

Identifiers

PMID21555213
PMCPMC3606815
OpenAlexW1993810216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.