Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21555104›Full record

ArticleUrologic oncology

Clinical application of a 3D ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy system.

Shyam Natarajan, Leonard S Marks, Daniel J A Margolis, Jiaoti Huang, Maria Luz Macairan, Patricia Lieu, Aaron Fenster

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Urologic oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 104 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
104citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

104 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. High Omega-3, Low Omega-6 Diet With Fish Oil for Men With Prostate Cancer on Active Surveillance: The CAPFISH-3 Randomized Clinical Trial.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025
    Trial
  4. Head-to-Head Comparison ofJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2022
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Quantitative Prostate MRI, From theAJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

44 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shyam NatarajanBiomedical Engineering IDP, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. shyam@ucla.edu
Leonard S Marks
Daniel J A Margolis
Jiaoti Huang
Maria Luz Macairan
Patricia Lieu
Aaron Fenster

Funding

Biopsy Tracking and MRI Fusion to Enhance Imaging of Cancer Within the ProstateR01CA158627 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI MARKS, LEONARD STEPHEN · 2011 to 2013
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA158627
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesProstate biopsy (Bx) has for 3 decades been performed in a systematic, but blind fashion using 2D ultrasound (US). Herein is described the initial clinical evaluation of a 3D Bx tracking and targeting device (Artemis; Eigen, Grass Valley, CA). Our main objective was to test accuracy of the new 3D method in men undergoing first and follow-up Bx to rule out prostate cancer (CaP). MATERIALS AND

methodsPatients in the study were men ages 35-87 years (66.1 ± 9.9), scheduled for Bx to rule out CaP, who entered into an IRB-approved protocol. A total of 218 subjects underwent conventional trans-rectal US (TRUS); the tracking system was then attached to the US probe; the prostate was scanned and a 3D reconstruction was created. All Bx sites were visualized in 3D and tracked electronically. In 11 men, a pilot study was conducted to test ability of the device to return a Bx to an original site. In 47 men, multi-parametric 3 Tesla MRI, incorporating T2-weighted images, dynamic contrast enhancement, and diffusion-weighted imaging, was performed in advance of the TRUS, allowing the stored MRI images to be fused with real-time US during biopsy. Lesions on MRI were delineated by a radiologist, assigned a grade of CaP suspicion, and fused into TRUS for biopsy targeting.

results3D Bx tracking was completed successfully in 180/218 patients, with a success rate approaching 95% among the last 50 men. Average time for Bx with the Artemis device was 15 minutes with an additional 5 minutes for MRI fusion and Bx targeting. In the tracking study, an ability to return to prior Bx sites (n=32) within 1.2 ± 1.1 mm SD was demonstrated and was independent of prostate volume or location of Bx site. In the MRI fusion study, when suspicious lesions were targeted, a 33% Bx-positivity rate was found compared with a 7% positivity rate for systematic, nontargeted Bx (19/57 cores vs. 9/124 cores, P=0.03).

conclusionUse of 3D tracking and image fusion has the potential to transform MRI into a clinical tool to aid biopsy and improve current methods for diagnosis and follow-up of CaP.

Indexed as

BiopsyImaging, Three-DimensionalAdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPilot ProjectsProstatic NeoplasmsUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID21555104
PMCPMC3432280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.