ArticleUrologic oncology
Clinical application of a 3D ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy system.
Article in Urologic oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 104 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
104 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Comparison of image-guided targeted biopsies versus systematic randomized biopsies in the detection of prostate cancer: a systematic literature review of well-designed studies.World journal of urology · 2014Pooled it
- High Omega-3, Low Omega-6 Diet With Fish Oil for Men With Prostate Cancer on Active Surveillance: The CAPFISH-3 Randomized Clinical Trial.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025Trial
- Head-to-Head Comparison ofJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2022Trial
- High-sensitivity Raman spectroscopy for prostate cancer detection and tissue extraction guidance.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
- Quantitative Prostate MRI, From theAJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2025Review
- Focal therapy of prostate cancer: Use of artificial intelligence to define tumour volume and predict treatment outcomes.BJUI compass · 2025Article
- Role of Systematic Biopsy in the Era of Targeted Biopsy: A Review.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Review
- Reliable Prostate Cancer Risk Mapping From MRI Using Targeted and Systematic Core Needle Biopsy Histopathology.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2024Article
- BioPrev-C - development and validation of a contemporary prostate cancer risk calculator.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Comparison of rigid and elastic registration methods in software-based targeted prostate biopsy: a multicenter cohort study.Turkish journal of medical sciences · 2024Article
- Niche preclinical and clinical applications of photoacoustic imaging with endogenous contrast.Photoacoustics · 2023Review
- Preoperative imaging accuracy in size determination of prostate cancer in men undergoing radical prostatectomy for clinically localised disease.Insights into imaging · 2023Article
- Cryotherapy for partial gland ablation of prostate cancer: Oncologic and safety outcomes.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- Detection of prostate cancer using diffusion-relaxation correlation spectrum imaging with support vector machine model - a feasibility study.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2022Article
- Recent Advances in Tracking Devices for Biomedical Ultrasound Imaging Applications.Micromachines · 2022Review
- Image-guided Raman spectroscopy navigation system to improve transperineal prostate cancer detection. Part 1: Raman spectroscopy fiber-optics system and in situ tissue characterization.Journal of biomedical optics · 2022Article
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Biopsy in Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer.The Journal of urology · 2022Article
- Bi-parametric MRI/TRUS fusion targeted repeat biopsy after systematic 10-12 core TRUS-guided biopsy reveals more significant prostate cancer especially in anteriorly located tumors.Acta radiologica open · 2022Article
- Towards targeted ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy by incorporating model and label uncertainty in cancer detection.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2022Article
44 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesProstate biopsy (Bx) has for 3 decades been performed in a systematic, but blind fashion using 2D ultrasound (US). Herein is described the initial clinical evaluation of a 3D Bx tracking and targeting device (Artemis; Eigen, Grass Valley, CA). Our main objective was to test accuracy of the new 3D method in men undergoing first and follow-up Bx to rule out prostate cancer (CaP). MATERIALS AND
methodsPatients in the study were men ages 35-87 years (66.1 ± 9.9), scheduled for Bx to rule out CaP, who entered into an IRB-approved protocol. A total of 218 subjects underwent conventional trans-rectal US (TRUS); the tracking system was then attached to the US probe; the prostate was scanned and a 3D reconstruction was created. All Bx sites were visualized in 3D and tracked electronically. In 11 men, a pilot study was conducted to test ability of the device to return a Bx to an original site. In 47 men, multi-parametric 3 Tesla MRI, incorporating T2-weighted images, dynamic contrast enhancement, and diffusion-weighted imaging, was performed in advance of the TRUS, allowing the stored MRI images to be fused with real-time US during biopsy. Lesions on MRI were delineated by a radiologist, assigned a grade of CaP suspicion, and fused into TRUS for biopsy targeting.
results3D Bx tracking was completed successfully in 180/218 patients, with a success rate approaching 95% among the last 50 men. Average time for Bx with the Artemis device was 15 minutes with an additional 5 minutes for MRI fusion and Bx targeting. In the tracking study, an ability to return to prior Bx sites (n=32) within 1.2 ± 1.1 mm SD was demonstrated and was independent of prostate volume or location of Bx site. In the MRI fusion study, when suspicious lesions were targeted, a 33% Bx-positivity rate was found compared with a 7% positivity rate for systematic, nontargeted Bx (19/57 cores vs. 9/124 cores, P=0.03).
conclusionUse of 3D tracking and image fusion has the potential to transform MRI into a clinical tool to aid biopsy and improve current methods for diagnosis and follow-up of CaP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.