Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21554730›Full record

ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2011

Divergence in cis-regulatory sequences surrounding the opsin gene arrays of African cichlid fishes.

Kelly E O'Quin, Daniel Smith, Zan Naseer, Jane Schulte, Samuel D Engel, Yong-Hwee E Loh, J Todd Streelman, Jeffrey L Boore, Karen L Carleton

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Royal Society open science · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Genetic and plastic variation in opsin gene expression, light sensitivity, and female response to visual signals in the guppy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kelly E O'QuinDepartment of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.
Daniel Smith
Zan Naseer
Jane Schulte
Samuel D Engel
Yong-Hwee E Loh
J Todd Streelman
Jeffrey L Boore
Karen L Carleton
University of Maryland, College Park · USGeorgia Institute of Technology · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

Genetic basis of cone opsin gene expressionR15EY016721 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE · PI CARLETON, KAREN L · 2005 to 2005
$218k
NEI NIH HHS R15 EY016721-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDivergence within cis-regulatory sequences may contribute to the adaptive evolution of gene expression, but functional alleles in these regions are difficult to identify without abundant genomic resources. Among African cichlid fishes, the differential expression of seven opsin genes has produced adaptive differences in visual sensitivity. Quantitative genetic analysis suggests that cis-regulatory alleles near the SWS2-LWS opsins may contribute to this variation. Here, we sequence BACs containing the opsin genes of two cichlids, Oreochromis niloticus and Metriaclima zebra. We use phylogenetic footprinting and shadowing to examine divergence in conserved non-coding elements, promoter sequences, and 3'-UTRs surrounding each opsin in search of candidate cis-regulatory sequences that influence cichlid opsin expression.

resultsWe identified 20 conserved non-coding elements surrounding the opsins of cichlids and other teleosts, including one known enhancer and a retinal microRNA. Most conserved elements contained computationally-predicted binding sites that correspond to transcription factors that function in vertebrate opsin expression; O. niloticus and M. zebra were significantly divergent in two of these. Similarly, we found a large number of relevant transcription factor binding sites within each opsin's proximal promoter, and identified five opsins that were considerably divergent in both expression and the number of transcription factor binding sites shared between O. niloticus and M. zebra. We also found several microRNA target sites within the 3'-UTR of each opsin, including two 3'-UTRs that differ significantly between O. niloticus and M. zebra. Finally, we examined interspecific divergence among 18 phenotypically diverse cichlids from Lake Malawi for one conserved non-coding element, two 3'-UTRs, and five opsin proximal promoters. We found that all regions were highly conserved with some evidence of CRX transcription factor binding site turnover. We also found three SNPs within two opsin promoters and one non-coding element that had weak association with cichlid opsin expression.

conclusionsThis study is the first to systematically search the opsins of cichlids for putative cis-regulatory sequences. Although many putative regulatory regions are highly conserved across a large number of phenotypically diverse cichlids, we found at least nine divergent sequences that could contribute to opsin expression differences in cis and stand out as candidates for future functional analyses.

Indexed as

3' Untranslated RegionsAnimalsBase SequenceCichlidsFish ProteinsMolecular Sequence DataOpsinsPhylogenyPromoter Regions, GeneticSequence AlignmentUntranslated Regions3' Untranslated RegionsFish ProteinsOpsinsUntranslated Regions

Identifiers

PMID21554730
PMCPMC3116502
OpenAlexW2136854633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.