Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21554692›Full record

SynthesisMalaria journal2011

Patterns of chloroquine use and resistance in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review of household survey and molecular data.

Anne E P Frosch, Meera Venkatesan, Miriam K Laufer

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Malaria journal, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Global Landscape ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Resistance to Antimalarial Monotherapy Is Cyclic.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Mapping partner drug resistance to guide antimalarial combination therapy policies in sub-Saharan Africa.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Characterization ofAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine in the prophylaxis and therapy of COVID-19 infection.Biochemical and biophysical research communications · 2021
    Review
  20. Review

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Anne E P FroschCenter for Vaccine Development, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 685 West Baltimore Street, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Meera Venkatesan
Miriam K Laufer
University of Maryland, Baltimore · USUniversity of Minnesota · USWorldwide Universities Network · GB

Funding

Clinical trial of chloroquine weekly or as IPT to prevent malaria in pregnancy inU01AI087624 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI LAUFER, MIRIAM K. · 2010 to 2013
$5.3M
Molecular epidemiology of drug resistant malariaK23AI059316 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI LAUFER, MIRIAM K. · 2004 to 2008
$674k
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIAID NIH HHS K23 AI059316NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI087624NIAID NIH HHS U01AI087624
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs a result of widespread chloroquine and sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) resistance, 90% of sub-Saharan African countries had adopted policies of artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) for treatment of uncomplicated malaria by 2007. In Malawi, cessation of chloroquine use was followed by the re-emergence of chloroquine-susceptible malaria. It was expected that introduction of ACT would lead to a return in chloroquine susceptibility throughout Africa, but this has not yet widely occurred. This observation suggests that there is continuing use of ineffective anti-malarials in Africa and that persistent chloroquine-resistant malaria is due to ongoing drug pressure despite national policy changes.

methodsTo estimate drug use on a national level, 2006-2007 Demographic Health Survey and Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey data from 21 African countries were analysed. Resistance data were compiled by systematic review of the published literature on the prevalence of the Plasmodium falciparum chloroquine resistance transporter polymorphism at codon 76, which causes chloroquine resistance.

resultsChloroquine was the most common anti-malarial used according to surveys from 14 of 21 countries analysed, predominantly in West Africa. SP was most commonly reported in two of 21 countries. Among eight countries with longitudinal molecular resistance data, the four countries where the highest proportion of children treated for fever received chloroquine (Uganda, Burkina Faso, Guinea Bissau, and Mali) also showed no significant declines in the prevalence of chloroquine-resistant infections. The three countries with low or decreasing chloroquine use among children who reported fever treatment (Malawi, Kenya, and Tanzania) had statistically significant declines in the prevalence of chloroquine resistance.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates that in 2006-2007, chloroquine and SP continued to be used at high rates in many African countries. In countries reporting sustained chloroquine use, chloroquine-resistant malaria persists. In contrast, a low level of estimated chloroquine use is associated with a declining prevalence of chloroquine resistance.

Indexed as

Drug ResistanceAfrica South of the SaharaAntimalarialsChild, PreschoolChloroquineDrug UtilizationFamily CharacteristicsHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPlasmodium falciparumAntimalarialsChloroquine

Identifiers

PMID21554692
PMCPMC3112453
OpenAlexW2110019817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.