Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21553239›Full record

ReviewInternal and emergency medicine2013

Recent advances in understanding Crohn's disease.

Antonio Di Sabatino, Laura Rovedatti, Francesca Vidali, Thomas Thornton Macdonald, Gino Roberto Corazza

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Internal and emergency medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Stigmatization and resilience in inflammatory bowel disease patients at one-year follow-up.Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Recent advances in understanding ulcerative colitis.Internal and emergency medicine · 2012
    Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Antonio Di SabatinoFirst Department of Medicine, Centro per lo Studio e la Cura delle Malattie Infiammatorie Croniche Intestinali, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy. a.disabatino@smatteo.pv.it
Laura Rovedatti
Francesca Vidali
Thomas Thornton Macdonald
Gino Roberto Corazza
University of Pavia · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITQueen Mary University of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crohn's disease is a chronic inflammatory bowel disorder resulting from an inappropriate innate and acquired immune response to commensal microorganisms in genetically susceptible individuals. This disease has a fluctuating course, with alternating periods of remission and relapses, and it is characterized by a remarkable clinical heterogeneity; it may be complicated by perianal fistulas, abscesses, and intestinal strictures leading to obstructions, besides several systemic manifestations. However, a complete resolution of the disease is currently not possible, yet Crohn's disease can be managed with established and novel therapies, which achieve long-term remission and acceptable quality of life. This review is focused on novel advances in basic and clinical aspects of Crohn's disease, although it also deals with new trends in diagnosis and treatment.

Indexed as

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalBiological FactorsCrohn DiseaseDietGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansIntestinesLife StyleRemission InductionAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalBiological Factors

Identifiers

PMID21553239
OpenAlexW2019507745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.