Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21553123›Full record

ArticlePlanta2011

Environmental regulation of stomatal response in the Arabidopsis Cvi-0 ecotype.

Keina Monda, Juntaro Negi, Atsuhiro Iio, Kensuke Kusumi, Mikiko Kojima, Mimi Hashimoto, Hitoshi Sakakibara, Koh Iba

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Planta, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Keina MondaDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8581, Japan.
Juntaro Negi
Atsuhiro Iio
Kensuke Kusumi
Mikiko Kojima
Mimi Hashimoto
Hitoshi Sakakibara
Koh Iba
Kyushu University · JPNational Institute for Environmental Studies · JPPlant (United States) · USRIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Arabidopsis Cape Verde Islands (Cvi-0) ecotype is known to differ from other ecotypes with respect to environmental stress responses. We analyzed the stomatal behavior of Cvi-0 plants, in response to environmental signals. We investigated the responses of stomatal conductance and aperture to high [CO₂] in the Cvi-0 and Col-0 ecotypes. Cvi-0 showed constitutively higher stomatal conductance and more stomatal opening than Col-0. Cvi-0 stomata opened in response to light, but the response was slow. Under low humidity, stomatal opening was increased in Cvi-0 compared to Col-0. We then assessed whether low humidity affects endogenous ABA levels in Cvi-0. In response to low humidity, Cvi-0 had much higher ABA levels than Col-0. However, epidermal peels experiments showed that Cvi-0 stomata were insensitive to ABA. Measurements of organic and inorganic ions in Cvi-0 guard cell protoplasts indicated an over-accumulation of osmoregulatory anions (malate and Cl⁻). This irregular anion homeostasis in the guard cells may explain the constitutive stomatal opening phenotypes of the Cvi-0 ecotype, which lacks high [CO₂]-induced and low humidity-induced stomatal closure.

Indexed as

EcotypeAbscisic AcidAir PollutantsArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsCabo VerdeCarbon DioxideGene Expression Regulation, PlantGenetic VariationPlant EpidermisPlant StomataSignal TransductionAbscisic AcidAir PollutantsArabidopsis ProteinsCarbon Dioxide

Identifiers

PMID21553123
OpenAlexW1997005241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.