Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21552665›Full record

ArticleClinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2011

What necessitates the conversion to open cholecystectomy? A retrospective analysis of 5164 consecutive laparoscopic operations.

Volkan Genc, Marlen Sulaimanov, Gokhan Cipe, Salim Ilksen Basceken, Nezih Erverdi, Mehmet Gurel, Nusret Aras, Selcuk M Hazinedaroglu

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05366907 (Open Cholecystectomy Among Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in a Tertiary Care Centre), which is not on this map. Cited by 34 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05366907 completednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Open Cholecystectomy Among Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in a Tertiary Care Centre: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study

TypeobservationalSponsorChitwan Medical CollegeRan2020 to 2021Enrolled345ConditionsCholelithiasis, Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, CholecystectomyArmsNo intervention is done
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Laparoscopic Repair for Perforated Peptic Ulcer Disease Has Better Outcomes Than Open Repair.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2019
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Video-based fully automatic assessment of open surgery suturing skills.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2022
    Article
  19. Laparoscopic 'D2 first' approach for obscure gallbladders.Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Volkan GencDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
Marlen Sulaimanov
Gokhan Cipe
Salim Ilksen Basceken
Nezih Erverdi
Mehmet Gurel
Nusret Aras
Selcuk M Hazinedaroglu
Ankara University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveLaparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has become the gold standard for the surgical treatment of gallbladder disease, but conversion to open cholecystectomy is still inevitable in certain cases. Knowledge of the rate and impact of the underlying reasons for conversion could help surgeons during preoperative assessment and improve the informed consent of patients. We decided to review the rate and causes of conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy.

methodThis study included all laparoscopic cholecystectomies due to gallstone disease undertaken from May 1999 to June 2010. The exclusion criteria were malignancy and/or existence of gallbladder polyps detected pathologically. Patient demographics, indications for cholecystectomy, concomitant diseases, and histories of previous abdominal surgery were collected. The rate of conversion to open cholecystectomy, the underlying reasons for conversion, and postoperative complications were also analyzed.

resultsOf 5382 patients for whom LC was attempted, 5164 were included this study. The overall rate of conversion to open cholecystectomy was 3.16% (163 patients). There were 84 male and 79 female patients; the mean age was 52.04 years (range: 26-85). The conversion rates in male and female patients were 5.6% and 2.2%, respectively (p < 0.001). The most common reasons for conversion were severe adhesions caused by tissue inflammation (97 patients) and fibrosis of Calot's triangle (12 patients). The overall postoperative morbidity rate was found to be 16.3% in patients who were converted to open surgery.

conclusionMale gender was found to be the only statistically significant risk factor for conversion in our series. LC can be safely performed with a conversion rate of less than 5% in all patient groups.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overChi-Square DistributionCholecystectomyCholecystectomy, LaparoscopicCholecystitis, AcuteComorbidityFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSex Factors

Identifiers

PMID21552665
PMCPMC3072001
OpenAlexW2138007388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.