Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21552419›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of biological sciences2011

Novel therapeutic strategies for targeting liver cancer stem cells.

Naoki Oishi, Xin Wei Wang

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of biological sciences, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 148 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Role of Polycomb Group Protein BMI1 in DNA Repair and Genomic Stability.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Naoki OishiLiver Carcinogenesis Section, Laboratory of Human Carcinogenesis, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892-4258, USA.
Xin Wei Wang
National Cancer Institute · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

The role of cancer stem cells in liver cancer heterogeneity and subtypesZIABC010876 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI WANG, XIN WEI · 2009 to 2025
$12.6M
Molecular signatures for liver cancer diagnosis and treatment stratificationZ01BC010313 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI WANG, XIN WEI · 1999 to 2008
$1.8M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 BC010313
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cancer stem cell (CSC) hypothesis was first proposed over 40 years ago. Advances in CSC isolation were first achieved in hematological malignancies, with the first CSC demonstrated in acute myeloid leukemia. However, using similar strategies and technologies, and taking advantage of available surface markers, CSCs have been more recently demonstrated in a growing range of epithelial and other solid organ malignancies, suggesting that the majority of malignancies are dependent on such a compartment.Primary liver cancer consists predominantly of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). It is believed that hepatic progenitor cells (HPCs) could be the origin of some HCCs and ICCs. Furthermore, stem cell activators such as Wnt/β-catenin, TGF-β, Notch and Hedgehog signaling pathways also expedite tumorigenesis, and these pathways could serve as molecular targets to assist in designing cancer prevention strategies. Recent studies indicate that additional factors such as EpCAM, Lin28 or miR-181 may also contribute to HCC progression by targeting HCC CSCs. Various therapeutic drugs that directly modulate CSCs have been examined in vivo and in vitro. However, CSCs clearly have a complex pathogenesis, with a considerable crosstalk and redundancy in signaling pathways, and hence targeting single molecules or pathways may have a limited benefit for treatment. Many of the key signaling molecules are shared by both CSCs and normal stem cells, which add further challenges for designing molecularly targeted strategies specific to CSCs but sparing normal stem cells to avoid side effects. In addition to the direct control of CSCs, many other factors that are needed for the maintenance of CSCs, such as angiogenesis, vasculogenesis, invasion and migration, hypoxia, immune evasion, multiple drug resistance, and radioresistance, should be taken into consideration when designing therapeutic strategies for HCC. Here we provide a brief review of molecular signaling in liver CSCs and present insights into new therapeutic strategies for targeting liver CSCs.

Indexed as

Liver RegenerationAnimalsBile Duct NeoplasmsBile Ducts, IntrahepaticCarcinoma, HepatocellularCholangiocarcinomaHumansLiver NeoplasmsMolecular Targeted TherapyNeoplastic Stem CellsSignal TransductionBMI-1 signalingCholangiocellular carcinomaEpCAMHedgehog signalingHepatocellular carcinomaLin-28Liver cancer stem cellmiR-181Notch signalingSelf-protectionSelf-renewalTGF-β signalingWnt/β-catenin signaling

Identifiers

PMID21552419
PMCPMC3088875
OpenAlexW2108894953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.