ArticleJournal of Cancer2011
Biological Markers in DCIS and Risk of Breast Recurrence: A Systematic Review.
Article in Journal of Cancer, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 85 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
85 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Local treatment options for young women with ductal carcinoma in situ: A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing breast conserving surgery with or without adjuvant radiotherapy, and mastectomy.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2022Pooled it
- Long-term outcomes of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis.BMC cancer · 2015Pooled it
- Prognostic and Predictive Value of HER2 Expression in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Results from the UK/ANZ DCIS Randomized Trial.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021Trial
- Incidence and consequence of close margins in patients with ductal carcinoma-in situ treated with mastectomy: is further therapy warranted?Annals of surgical oncology · 2013Trial
- Erbin interacts with NHERF1 and Ezrin to stabilize a membrane ErbB2 signaling complex in HER2-positive breast cancer.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2025Article
- Evolutionary measures show that recurrence of DCIS is distinct from progression to breast cancer.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2025Article
- Male accessory breast carcinoma: a rare case report and literature review.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Case Report: Breast ductal carcinomaFrontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Evolutionary Measures Show that Recurrence of DCIS is Distinct from Progression to Breast Cancer.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Molecular subtype and risk of local recurrence after nipple‑sparing mastectomy for breast cancer.Oncology letters · 2024Article
- Upper Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis in the Setting of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: A Case Report.Cureus · 2024Article
- Tools to Guide Radiation Oncologists in the Management of DCIS.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Progression from ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive breast cancer: molecular features and clinical significance.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024Review
- Immune cell infiltrate in ductal carcinoma in situ and the risk of dying from breast cancer: case-control study.The British journal of surgery · 2024Article
- Impact of cavity shave margins in patients with ductal carcinomaFrontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Worth a Pound of Cure? Emerging Strategies and Challenges in Cancer Immunoprevention.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2023Review
- Subtypes of high-grade breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): incidence and potential clinical impact.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2023Article
- Positive surgical margins after breast-conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in-situ: does histologic grade or estrogen receptor status matter?Breast cancer research and treatment · 2023Article
- A living biobank of patient-derived ductal carcinoma in situ mouse-intraductal xenografts identifies risk factors for invasive progression.Cancer cell · 2023Article
- Nucleocytoplasmic transport of active HER2 causes fractional escape from the DCIS-like state.Nature communications · 2023Article
25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding of the biology and clinical behavior of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is currently inadequate. The aim of this comprehensive review was to identify important molecular biological markers associated with DCIS and candidate markers associated with increased risk of ipsilateral recurrence after diagnosis of DCIS. A comprehensive systematic review was performed to identify studies published in the past 10 years that investigated biological markers in DCIS. To be included in this review, studies that investigated the rate of biological expression of markers had to report on at least 30 patients; studies that analyzed the recurrence risk associated with biomarker expression had to report on at least 50 patients. There were 6,252 patients altogether in our review. Biological markers evaluated included steroid receptors, proliferation markers, cell cycle regulation and apoptotic markers, angiogenesis-related proteins, epidermal growth factor receptor family receptors, extracellular matrix-related proteins, and COX-2. Although the studies in this review provide valuable preliminary information regarding the expression and prognostic significance of biomarkers in DCIS, common limitations of published studies (case-series, cohort, and case-control studies) were that they were limited to small patient cohorts in which the extent of surgery and use of radiotherapy or endocrine therapy varied from patient to patient, and variable methods of determining biomarker expression. These constraints made it difficult to interpret the absolute effect of expression of various biomarkers on risk of local recurrence. No prospective validation studies were identified. As the study of biomarkers are in their relative infancy in DCIS compared with invasive breast cancer, key significant prognostic and predictive markers associated with invasive breast cancer have not been adequately studied in DCIS. There is a critical need for prospective analyses of novel and other known breast cancer molecular markers in large cohorts of patient with DCIS to differentiate indolent from aggressive DCIS and better tailor the need and extent of current therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.