Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21552286›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Microbiology2011

Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems.

Kira S Makarova, Daniel H Haft, Rodolphe Barrangou, Stan J J Brouns, Emmanuelle Charpentier, Philippe Horvath, Sylvain Moineau, Francisco J M Mojica, Yuri I Wolf, Alexander F Yakunin and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1,248 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1,248citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
68.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1,248 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2,472 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. CRISPR/Cas9 mediates precise and efficient gene editing inSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Bacterial immune systems.Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

1,188 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Kira S MakarovaNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, Maryland 20894, USA.
Daniel H Haft
Rodolphe Barrangou
Stan J J Brouns
Emmanuelle Charpentier
Philippe Horvath
Sylvain Moineau
Francisco J M Mojica
Yuri I Wolf
Alexander F Yakunin
John van der Oost
Eugene V Koonin
National Center for Biotechnology Information · USWageningen University & Research · NLJ. Craig Venter Institute · USNational Institutes of Health · USUmeå University · SEUniversité Laval · CAUniversity of Alicante · ESUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Comparative Analysis Of Completely Sequenced GenomesZIALM000073 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI KOONIN, EUGENE V · 2009 to 2025
$43.1M
Finding Protein Sequence Motifs--Methods And ApplicationsZIALM000061 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI KOONIN, EUGENE V · 2009 to 2025
$10.6M
Algorithmically-Tuned Protein Families, Rule_Base and Characterized ProteinsR01HG004881 · NHGRI · J. CRAIG VENTER INSTITUTE, INC. · PI HAFT, DANIEL H. · 2008 to 2010
$1.6M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA LM000073NHGRI NIH HHS 1 R01 HG004881NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG004881
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The CRISPR-Cas (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats-CRISPR-associated proteins) modules are adaptive immunity systems that are present in many archaea and bacteria. These defence systems are encoded by operons that have an extraordinarily diverse architecture and a high rate of evolution for both the cas genes and the unique spacer content. Here, we provide an updated analysis of the evolutionary relationships between CRISPR-Cas systems and Cas proteins. Three major types of CRISPR-Cas system are delineated, with a further division into several subtypes and a few chimeric variants. Given the complexity of the genomic architectures and the extremely dynamic evolution of the CRISPR-Cas systems, a unified classification of these systems should be based on multiple criteria. Accordingly, we propose a 'polythetic' classification that integrates the phylogenies of the most common cas genes, the sequence and organization of the CRISPR repeats and the architecture of the CRISPR-cas loci.

Indexed as

Adaptive ImmunityArchaeaArchaeal ProteinsBacterial ProteinsGenome, BacterialPhylogenyRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidArchaeal ProteinsBacterial Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21552286
PMCPMC3380444
OpenAlexW2163241233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.