Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21551021›Full record

Trial reportClinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN2011

Clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of lanthanum carbonate as second-line therapy in hemodialysis patients in Japan.

Shunsuke Goto, Hirotaka Komaba, Kensuke Moriwaki, Akira Fujimori, Koji Shibuya, Masato Nishioka, Jong-Il Kim, Kunihiko Yoshiya, Jeongsoo Shin, Hirohito Hasegawa and 5 more

Abstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder in Asia.Kidney diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. The management of hyperphosphatemia by lanthanum carbonate in chronic kidney disease patients.International journal of nephrology and renovascular disease · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Shunsuke GotoDivision of Nephrology and Kidney Center, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Hirotaka Komaba
Kensuke Moriwaki
Akira Fujimori
Koji Shibuya
Masato Nishioka
Jong-Il Kim
Kunihiko Yoshiya
Jeongsoo Shin
Hirohito Hasegawa
Masatomo Taniguchi
Hideki Fujii
Shinichi Nishi
Isao Kamae
Masafumi Fukagawa
Kobe University · JPRokko Island Konan Hospital · JPTokai University · JPChibune General Hospital · JPEdogawa Hospital · JPKyushu University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesLanthanum carbonate (LC) is a nonaluminum, noncalcium phosphate binder that is effective for hyperphosphatemia in dialysis patients. However, its efficacy and cost-effectiveness as second-line therapy have not been fully examined. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We first conducted a multicenter, open-label, 16-week clinical trial to examine the effect of additive LC in 116 hemodialysis patients who had uncontrolled hyperphosphatemia with conventional phosphorus-lowering therapy alone. Based on these clinical data, a state transition model was developed to evaluate the benefits and costs associated with LC as second-line therapy. Reduced risks for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality among patients treated with LC arise through more of the population achieving the target phosphorus levels. Uncertainty was explored through sensitivity analysis.

resultsAfter 16 weeks of additive LC treatment, mean serum phosphorus levels decreased from 7.30 ± 0.90 to 5.71 ± 1.32 mg/dl, without significant changes in serum calcium or intact parathyroid hormone levels. A subsequent cost-effectiveness analysis showed that compared with conventional treatment, additive LC incurred an average additional lifetime cost of $22,054 per person and conferred an additional 0.632 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). This resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $34,896 per QALY gained. Applying a cost-effectiveness threshold of $50,000 per QALY, a probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that additive LC had a 97.4% probability of being cost-effective compared with conventional treatment.

conclusionsOur results indicate that the use of LC as second-line therapy would be cost-effective among hemodialysis patients with uncontrolled hyperphosphatemia in Japan.

Indexed as

Drug CostsRenal DialysisAdolescentAdultAgedAnalysis of VarianceBiomarkersCardiovascular DiseasesChelating AgentsCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansHyperphosphatemiaJapanKidney Failure, ChronicLanthanumBiomarkersChelating AgentsLanthanumlanthanum carbonatePhosphorus

Identifiers

PMID21551021
PMCPMC3109935
OpenAlexW2152876581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.