Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21549136›Full record

ReviewPhysiology & behavior2011

Feeding and reward: perspectives from three rat models of binge eating.

Rebecca L Corwin, Nicole M Avena, Mary M Boggiano

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Physiology & behavior, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 130 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
130citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
28.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

130 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 283 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Weight Cycling Deregulates Eating Behavior in Mice via the Induction of Durable Gut Dysbiosis.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Current perspectives on brain circuits involved in food addiction-like behaviors.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2024
    Review
  16. Obesity and Depression: Common Link and Possible Targets.CNS & neurological disorders drug targets · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. A paraventricular thalamus to insular cortex glutamatergic projection gates "emotional" stress-induced binge eating in females.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

70 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rebecca L CorwinNutritional Sciences Dept., College of Health and Human Development, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, United States. rxc13@psu.edu
Nicole M Avena
Mary M Boggiano
Pennsylvania State University · USPrinceton University · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

Why is the prevalence of obesity so high in U.S. Southern States? Regional predictors of BMI and obesity treatment response.P30DK056336 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI James O Hill · 2000 to 2026
$31.9M
NEUROBIOLOGY OF BINGE-TYPE BEHAVIORR01MH067943 · NIMH · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY-UNIV PARK · PI CORWIN, REBECCA L · 2004 to 2013
$2.7M
Translational Research on Addiction to Palatable FoodK01DA031230 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI AVENA, NICOLE M · 2011 to 2015
$780k
Neurochemistry of Stress-Induced Binge EatingR03DK066007 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI BOGGIANO, MARY MICHELLE · 2004 to 2006
$432k
Neurochemical mechanisms of bingeing on palatable foodsF32DK079793 · NIDDK · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI AVENA, NICOLE M · 2007 to 2009
$129k
NEUROBIOLOGY OF BINGE TYPE EATINGR03MH060310 · NIMH · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY-UNIV PARK · PI CORWIN, REBECCA L · 1999 to 2000
$68k
NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA031230NIDDK NIH HHS DK066007NIDDK NIH HHS DK079793NIDDK NIH HHS F32 DK079793NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK056336NIDDK NIH HHS P30DK056336NIDDK NIH HHS R03 DK066007NIMH NIH HHS MH60310NIMH NIH HHS MH67943NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH067943NIMH NIH HHS R03 MH060310
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research has focused on understanding how overeating can affect brain reward mechanisms and subsequent behaviors, both preclinically and in clinical research settings. This work is partly driven by the need to uncover the etiology and possible treatments for the ongoing obesity epidemic. However, overeating, or non-homeostatic feeding behavior, can occur independent of obesity. Isolating the variable of overeating from the consequence of increased body weight is of great utility, as it is well known that increased body weight or obesity can impart its own deleterious effects on physiology, neural processes, and behavior. In this review, we present data from three selected animal models of normal-weight non-homeostatic feeding behavior that have been significantly influenced by Bart Hoebel's 40+-yr career studying motivation, feeding, reinforcement, and the neural mechanisms that participate in the regulation of these processes. First, a model of sugar bingeing is described (Avena/Hoebel), in which animals with repeated, intermittent access to a sugar solution develop behaviors and brain changes that are similar to the effects of some drugs of abuse, serving as the first animal model of food addiction. Second, another model is described (Boggiano) in which a history of dieting and stress can perpetuate further binge eating of palatable and non-palatable food. In addition, a model (Boggiano) is described that allows animals to be classified as having a binge-prone vs. binge-resistant behavioral profile. Lastly, a limited access model is described (Corwin) in which non-food deprived rats with sporadic limited access to a high-fat food develop binge-type behaviors. These models are considered within the context of their effects on brain reward systems, including dopamine, the opioids, cholinergic systems, serotonin, and GABA. Collectively, the data derived from the use of these models clearly show that behavioral and neuronal consequences of bingeing on a palatable food, even when at a normal body weight, are different from those that result from simply consuming the palatable food in a non-binge manner. These findings may be important in understanding how overeating can influence behavior and brain chemistry.

Indexed as

RewardAnimalsBulimiaDisease Models, AnimalFeeding BehaviorFood PreferencesRats

Identifiers

PMID21549136
PMCPMC3132131
OpenAlexW1981930455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.