Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21548920›Full record

ArticleEvoDevo2011

Breaking evolutionary and pleiotropic constraints in mammals: On sloths, manatees and homeotic mutations.

Irma Varela-Lasheras, Alexander J Bakker, Steven D van der Mije, Johan Aj Metz, Joris van Alphen, Frietson Galis

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EvoDevo, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 130 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Homeotic and nonhomeotic patterns in the tetrapod vertebral formula.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  6. Increased incidences of cervical ribs in deer indicate extinction risk.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Limb positioning and initiation: An evolutionary context of pattern and formation.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Water lily (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  18. Arcuate foramen: "Anatomical variation shape or adaptation legacy?"Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2019
    Article
  19. Embryonic and postembryonic development of the ornamental twin-tail goldfish.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Irma Varela-Lasheras *NCB Naturalis, Darwinweg1, 2333 CR Leiden, The Netherlands.
Alexander J Bakker *NCB Naturalis, Darwinweg1, 2333 CR Leiden, The Netherlands.
Steven D van der MijeNCB Naturalis, Darwinweg1, 2333 CR Leiden, The Netherlands.
Johan Aj MetzIIASA, Laxenburg, Austria.
Joris van AlphenNCB Naturalis, Darwinweg1, 2333 CR Leiden, The Netherlands.
Frietson GalisNCB Naturalis, Darwinweg1, 2333 CR Leiden, The Netherlands.
Naturalis Biodiversity Center · NLAmsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLInternational Institute for Applied Systems Analysis · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMammals as a rule have seven cervical vertebrae, except for sloths and manatees. Bateson proposed that the change in the number of cervical vertebrae in sloths is due to homeotic transformations. A recent hypothesis proposes that the number of cervical vertebrae in sloths is unchanged and that instead the derived pattern is due to abnormal primaxial/abaxial patterning.

resultsWe test the detailed predictions derived from both hypotheses for the skeletal patterns in sloths and manatees for both hypotheses. We find strong support for Bateson's homeosis hypothesis. The observed vertebral and rib patterns cannot be explained by changes in primaxial/abaxial patterning. Vertebral patterns in sloths and manatees are similar to those in mice and humans with abnormal numbers of cervical vertebrae: incomplete and asymmetric homeotic transformations are common and associated with skeletal abnormalities. In sloths the homeotic vertebral shift involves a large part of the vertebral column. As such, similarity is greatest with mice mutant for genes upstream of Hox.

conclusionsWe found no skeletal abnormalities in specimens of sister taxa with a normal number of cervical vertebrae. However, we always found such abnormalities in conspecifics with an abnormal number, as in many of the investigated dugongs. These findings strongly support the hypothesis that the evolutionary constraints on changes of the number of cervical vertebrae in mammals is due to deleterious pleitropic effects. We hypothesize that in sloths and manatees low metabolic and activity rates severely reduce the usual stabilizing selection, allowing the breaking of the pleiotropic constraints. This probably also applies to dugongs, although to a lesser extent.

Identifiers

PMID21548920
PMCPMC3120709
OpenAlexW2153334396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.