Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21548766›Full record

ArticleVector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.)2011

Rodents as sentinels for the prevalence of tick-borne encephalitis virus.

Katharina Achazi, Daniel Růžek, Oliver Donoso-Mantke, Mathias Schlegel, Hanan Sheikh Ali, Mathias Wenk, Jonas Schmidt-Chanasit, Lutz Ohlmeyer, Ferdinand Rühe, Torsten Vor and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 125 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Identifying hotspots and risk factors for tick-borne encephalitis virus emergence at its range margins to guide interventions, Great Britain.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Rodents as Sentinels forPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Seroprevalence ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Katharina AchaziCenter for Biological Security (ZBS-1), Robert Koch-Institut, Berlin, Germany. achazik@rki.de
Daniel Růžek
Oliver Donoso-Mantke
Mathias Schlegel
Hanan Sheikh Ali
Mathias Wenk
Jonas Schmidt-Chanasit
Lutz Ohlmeyer
Ferdinand Rühe
Torsten Vor
Christian Kiffner
René Kallies
Rainer G Ulrich
Matthias Niedrig
Robert Koch Institute · DEFriedrich-Loeffler-Institut · DEUniversity of Göttingen · DEBernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine · DEEberswalde University for Sustainable Development · DEMitel (Canada) · CASewanee: The University of the South · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) causes one of the most important flavivirus infections of the central nervous system, affecting humans in Europe and Asia. It is mainly transmitted by the bite of an infected tick and circulates among them and their vertebrate hosts. Until now, TBE risk analysis in Germany has been based on the incidence of human cases. Because of an increasing vaccination rate, this approach might be misleading, especially in regions of low virus circulation.

methodTo test the suitability of rodents as a surrogate marker for virus spread, laboratory-bred Microtus arvalis voles were experimentally infected with TBEV and analyzed over a period of 100 days by real-time (RT)-quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Further, the prevalence of TBEV in rodents trapped in Brandenburg, a rural federal state in northeastern Germany with autochthonous TBE cases, was determined and compared with that in rodents from German TBE risk areas as well as TBE nonrisk areas.

resultsIn experimentally infected M. arvalis voles, TBEV was detectable in different organs for at least 3 months and in blood for 1 month. Ten percent of all rodents investigated were positive for TBEV. However, in TBE risk areas, the infection rate was higher compared with that of areas with only single human cases or of nonrisk areas. TBEV was detected in six rodent species: Apodemus agrarius, Apodemus flavicollis, Apodemus sylvaticus, Microtus agrestis, Microtus arvalis, and Myodes glareolus. M. glareolus showed a high infection rate in all areas investigated. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionThe infection experiments proved that TBEV can be reliably detected in infected M. arvalis voles. These voles developed a persistent TBE infection without clinical symptoms. Further, the study showed that rodents, especially M. glareolus, are promising sentinels particularly in areas of low TBEV circulation.

Indexed as

AnimalsEncephalitis, Tick-BorneEncephalitis Viruses, Tick-BorneGenetic VariationNorwayNucleic Acid ConformationPrevalenceRNA, ViralRodent DiseasesRodentiaSentinel SurveillanceRNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID21548766
PMCPMC3115460
OpenAlexW2014192687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.