Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21547613›Full record

ReviewSkeletal radiology2011

3 Tesla MR neurography--technique, interpretation, and pitfalls.

Avneesh Chhabra, Pearlene P Lee, Cary Bizzell, Theodoros Soldatos

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Skeletal radiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Development of magnetic resonance imaging of brachial plexus neuralgia.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee.Polish journal of radiology · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. New Techniques in MR Imaging of the Ankle and Foot.Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America · 2017
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Avneesh ChhabraRussell H Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 601 North Caroline Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA. achhabr6@jhmi.edu
Pearlene P Lee
Cary Bizzell
Theodoros Soldatos

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MRI has been used for almost two decades for the evaluation of peripheral nerve disorders. This article highlights the relative advantages and disadvantages of 3T MR neurography in the evaluation of peripheral neuropathies. The authors also describe the high-resolution MR neurography technique on 3T MRI, along with the approach to its interpretation that has evolved at one institution.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingHumansPeripheral Nervous System Diseases

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.