ArticleInternational journal of body composition research2004
Measurement of Body and Liver Fat in Small Animals Using Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography.
Article in International journal of body composition research, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- CT-based methods for assessment of metabolic dysfunction associated with fatty liver disease.European radiology experimental · 2023Review
- Validation of goose liver fat measurement by QCT and CSE-MRI with biochemical extraction and pathology as reference.European radiology · 2018Article
- Regulation of Blood Pressure, Appetite, and Glucose by CNS Melanocortin System in Hyperandrogenemic Female SHR.American journal of hypertension · 2016Article
- Validation of quantitative magnetic resonance for the determination of body composition of mice.International journal of body composition research · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) was used to determine percent body fat in mice, and relative liver fat in lemmings fasted for 0, 6, 12 or 18 hours to induce a wide range of liver fat content. Accuracy of the pQCT was determined by comparing pQCT-derived fat to that from chemical extraction using 30 male mice (whole body) and 26 female lemmings (liver only). To determine whether pQCT could measure changes in liver fat (%) in live animals, two groups of lemmings were scanned on 4 consecutive days under anesthesia. Controls (n = 3) had ad libitum access to food, whereas the fasted group (n = 5) was deprived of food for 18 hr before being measured on day 2 and then refed. The coefficient of variation (CV) for determining percent body fat in mice using the pQCT was 3.9% (±1.8 SD). Percent body fat determined by pQCT significantly overestimated percent fat as measured by chemical extraction (14.5 ± 3.2 vs 12.3 ± 2.9% respectively, P < 0.01, mean ± SD). However, percent body fat by pQCT was highly related to chemical extraction percent fat (r = 0.95, P < 0.001). The liver attenuation values from pQCT were highly related to percent liver fat (r=0.98, P<0.001) in lemmings. The technique showed excellent precision with a CV of 0.3 ± 0.1%. The two groups (control vs fasted) did not differ in their percent liver fat on day 1 (5.4% vs 5.8%). On day 2 the fasted group had a significantly higher percent liver fat than controls (5.9% vs 17.3%; p<0.05). Following refeeding, there were no significant group differences in percent liver fat on days 3 and 4. Our data indicate that pQCT has good accuracy and precision for determining percent body fat, and liver fat in small animals and can be used to track changes in liver fat over time.
Identifiers
21546985PMC3086261W170845564What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.