Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21546611›Full record

ArticleJournal of andrology

Paternal DNA damage resulting from various sperm treatments persists after fertilization and is similar before and after DNA replication.

Yasuhiro Yamauchi, Jonathan M Riel, Monika A Ward

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of andrology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Environmental pollutants: genetic damage and epigenetic changes in male germ cells.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2016
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Correlation between body mass index of Chinese males and assisted reproductive technology outcome.International journal of clinical and experimental medicine · 2015
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Transpositional transgenesis withMobile genetic elements · 2013
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yasuhiro YamauchiInstitute for Biogenesis Research, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA.
Jonathan M Riel
Monika A Ward
University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa · USBiogen (United States) · US

Funding

Transgenic Mouse, ICSI and IVF CoreP20GM103457 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA · PI WARD, WILLIAM S · 2012 to 2018
$12.9M
ULTRASOUND-TARGETED MICROBUBBLE DESTRUCTION IN COMBINATION WITH THE PIGGYBACP20RR024206 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA · PI GOH, WILLIAM AI-KENG · 2008 to 2011
$8.4M
Sperm DNA damage in fertilizationR21HD048845 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA · PI WARD, MONIKA A · 2005 to 2006
$285k
NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR024206NCRR NIH HHS RR024206NICHD NIH HHS HD048845NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD048845NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103457
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In spite of its highly condensed state, sperm DNA is vulnerable to damage that can originate from oxidative stress, the activity of sperm-specific nucleases, or both. After fertilization, in the oocyte, paternal chromatin undergoes dramatic changes, and during this extensive remodeling, it can be both repaired and degraded, and these processes can be linked to DNA synthesis. Here, we analyzed sperm response to damage-inducing treatments both before and after fertilization and before or after zygotic DNA replication. Epididymal mouse spermatozoa were either frozen without cryoprotection (FT) or treated with detergent Triton X-100 coupled with dithiothreitol (TX+DTT) to induce DNA damage. Fresh, untreated sperm served as control. Immediately after preparation, spermatozoa from 3 groups were taken for comet assay, or for intracytoplasmic sperm injection into prometaphase I oocytes to visualize prematurely condensed single-chromatid chromosomes, or into mature metaphase II oocytes to visualize chromosomes after DNA replication. Comet assay revealed increased DNA fragmentation in treated sperm when compared with control, with FT sperm more severely affected. Chromosome analysis demonstrated paternal DNA damage in oocytes injected with treated, but not with fresh, sperm, with FT and TX+DTT groups now yielding similar damage. There were no differences in the incidence of abnormal paternal karyoplates before and after DNA synthesis in all examined groups. This study provides evidence that subjecting sperm to DNA damage-inducing treatments results in degradation of highly condensed sperm chromatin when it is still packed within the sperm head, and that this DNA damage persists after fertilization. The difference in DNA damage in sperm subjected to 2 treatments was ameliorated in the fertilized oocytes, suggesting that some chromatin repair might have occurred. This process, however, was independent of DNA synthesis and took place during oocyte maturation.

Indexed as

CryopreservationDNA DamageDNA RepairDNA ReplicationSperm Injections, IntracytoplasmicAnimalsChromatin Assembly and DisassemblyComet AssayDithiothreitolDNA FragmentationFemaleMaleMiceOctoxynolOocytesSpermatozoaDithiothreitolOctoxynol

Identifiers

PMID21546611
PMCPMC3331785
OpenAlexW2027006211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.