Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21545284›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of biophysics2011

Decision making in living cells: lessons from a simple system.

Ido Golding

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of biophysics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Bacteriophage self-counting in the presence of viral replication.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. AreViruses · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ido GoldingVerna and Marrs McLean Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA. igolding@illinois.edu

Funding

GENE REGULATION IN PHAGE LAMBDA: A REAL-TIME STUDY WITH SINGLE-EVENT RESOLUTIONR01GM082837 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI GOLDING, IDO · 2008 to 2020
$4.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM082837NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM082837
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The life cycle of bacteriophage lambda serves as a simplified paradigm for cell-fate decisions. The ongoing quantitative, high-resolution experimental investigation of this life cycle has produced some important insights in recent years. These insights have to do with the way cells choose among alternative fates, how they maintain long-term memory of their gene-expression state, and how they switch from one stable state to another. The recent studies have highlighted the role of spatiotemporal effects in cellular processes and the importance of distinguishing chemical stochasticity from possible hidden variables in cellular decision making.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsBacteriophage lambdaCell Physiological PhenomenaComputer SimulationDecision MakingHumansModels, StatisticalSignal TransductionViral ProteinsViral Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21545284
PMCPMC4465489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.