ArticlePloS one2011
A multiscale investigation of bicoid-dependent transcriptional events in Drosophila embryos.
Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- The Drosophila Pioneer Factor Zelda Modulates the Nuclear Microenvironment of a Dorsal Target Enhancer to Potentiate Transcriptional Output.Current biology : CB · 2019Article
- Precision of Readout at the hunchback Gene: Analyzing Short Transcription Time Traces in Living Fly Embryos.PLoS computational biology · 2016Article
- Article
- Modulation of temporal dynamics of gene transcription by activator potency in the Drosophila embryo.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2015Article
- Probing the impact of temperature on molecular events in a developmental system.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- Combining protein and mRNA quantification to decipher transcriptional regulation.Nature methods · 2015Article
- Fundamental origins and limits for scaling a maternal morphogen gradient.Nature communications · 2015Article
- Mid-embryo patterning and precision in Drosophila segmentation: Krüppel dual regulation of hunchback.PloS one · 2015Article
- Adaptation of the length scale and amplitude of the Bicoid gradient profile to achieve robust patterning in abnormally large Drosophila melanogaster embryos.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2014Article
- Analytic approaches to stochastic gene expression in multicellular systems.Biophysical journal · 2013Review
- Dampened regulates the activating potency of Bicoid and the embryonic patterning outcome in Drosophila.Nature communications · 2013Article
- A spatial point pattern analysis in Drosophila blastoderm embryos evaluating the potential inheritance of transcriptional states.PloS one · 2013Article
- Uncovering a dynamic feature of the transcriptional regulatory network for anterior-posterior patterning in the Drosophila embryo.PloS one · 2013Article
- The role of Bicoid cooperative binding in the patterning of sharp borders in Drosophila melanogaster.Developmental biology · 2012Article
- Evaluating the Drosophila Bicoid morphogen gradient system through dissecting the noise in transcriptional bursts.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2012Article
- Mutual repression enhances the steepness and precision of gene expression boundaries.PLoS computational biology · 2012Article
- Mathematics and biology: a Kantian view on the history of pattern formation theory.Development genes and evolution · 2011Review
- Transcriptional activators and activation mechanisms.Protein & cell · 2011Review
- Scaling of the Bicoid morphogen gradient by a volume-dependent production rate.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMorphogen molecules form concentration gradients to provide spatial information to cells in a developing embryo. Precisely how cells decode such information to form patterns with sharp boundaries remains an open question. For example, it remains controversial whether the Drosophila morphogenetic protein Bicoid (Bcd) plays a transient or sustained role in activating its target genes to establish sharp expression boundaries during development. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsIn this study, we describe a method to simultaneously detect Bcd and the nascent transcripts of its target genes in developing embryos. This method allows us to investigate the relationship between Bcd and the transcriptional status of individual copies of its target genes on distinct scales. We show that, on three scales analyzed concurrently--embryonic, nuclear and local, the actively-transcribing gene copies are associated with high Bcd concentrations. These results underscore the importance of Bcd as a sustained input for transcriptional decisions of individual copies of its target genes during development. We also show that the Bcd-dependent transcriptional decisions have a significantly higher noise than Bcd-dependent gene products, suggesting that, consistent with theoretical studies, time and/or space averaging reduces the noise of Bcd-activated transcriptional output. Finally, our analysis of an X-linked Bcd target gene reveals that Bcd-dependent transcription bursts at twice the frequency in males as in females, providing a mechanism for dosage compensation in early Drosophila embryos. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Our study represents a first experimental uncovering of the actions of Bcd in controlling the actual transcriptional events while its positional information is decoded during development. It establishes a sustained role of Bcd in transcriptional decisions of individual copies of its target genes to generate sharp expression boundaries. It also provides an experimental evaluation of the effect of time and/or space averaging on Bcd-dependent transcriptional output, and establishes a dosage compensation mechanism in early Drosophila embryos.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.