Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21544094›Full record

ArticleGene therapy2011

Increased oncolytic efficacy for high-grade gliomas by optimal integration of ionizing radiation into the replicative cycle of HSV-1.

S J Advani, J M Markert, R F Sood, S Samuel, G Y Gillespie, M Y Shao, B Roizman, R R Weichselbaum

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gene therapy, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Oncolytic Viral Therapy for Malignant Glioma and Their Application in Clinical Practice.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Oncolytic virotherapy for urological cancers.Nature reviews. Urology · 2016
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

S J AdvaniDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Center for Advanced Radiotherapy Technologies, Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. sjadvani@ucsd.edu
J M Markert
R F Sood
S Samuel
G Y Gillespie
M Y Shao
B Roizman
R R Weichselbaum
University of Chicago · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

Virus Production CoreP01CA071933 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI PARKER, JACQUELINE N · 1997 to 2013
$14.5M
Viral and molecular chemotherapy of malignant CNS tumorsP50CA097247 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI GILLESPIE, G. YANCEY · 2002 to 2009
$13.5M
NCI NIH HHS CA 071933NCI NIH HHS CA 097247NCI NIH HHS P01 CA071933NCI NIH HHS P50 CA097247
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oncolytic viruses have been combined with standard cancer therapies to increase therapeutic efficacy. Given the sequential activation of herpes viral genes (herpes simplex virus-1, HSV-1) and the temporal cellular changes induced by ionizing radiation, we hypothesized an optimal temporal sequence existed in combining oncolytic HSV-1 with ionizing radiation. Murine U-87 glioma xenografts were injected with luciferase encoding HSV-1, and ionizing radiation (IR) was given at times before or after viral injection. HSV-1 replication and tumor-volume response were followed. Radiation given 6-9 h after HSV-1 injection resulted in maximal viral luciferase expression and infectious viral production in tumor xenografts. The greatest xenograft regression was also seen with radiation given 6 h after viral injection. We then tested if HSV-1 replication had a dose response to ionizing radiation. HSV-1 luciferase expression exhibited a dose response as xenografts were irradiated from 0 to 5 Gy. There was no difference in viral luciferase expression as IR dose increased from 5 Gy up to 20 Gy. These results suggest that the interaction of IR with the HSV-1 lytic cycle can be manipulated for therapeutic gain by delivering IR at a specific time within viral replicative cycle.

Indexed as

Radiation, IonizingAnimalsBrain NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyDose-Response Relationship, RadiationGliomaHerpesvirus 1, HumanMiceMice, NudeOncolytic VirotherapyOncolytic VirusesVirus Replication

Identifiers

PMID21544094
PMCPMC8670556
OpenAlexW2066267613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.