Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21543633›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology2011

mu-Opioid receptor stimulation in the nucleus accumbens elevates fatty tastant intake by increasing palatability and suppressing satiety signals.

Yoshihiro Katsuura, Jennifer A Heckmann, Sharif A Taha

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. A Possible Anti-anxiety Effect of Appetitive Aggression and a Possible Link to the Work of Donald Winnicott.Scandinavian journal of child and adolescent psychiatry and psychology · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Making Sense of Rodent Models of Anhedonia.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2018
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Characterizing ingestive behavior through licking microstructure: Underlying neurobiology and its use in the study of obesity in animal models.International journal of developmental neuroscience : the official journal of the International Society for Developmental Neuroscience · 2018
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Reassessing wanting and liking in the study of mesolimbic influence on food intake.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2016
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yoshihiro KatsuuraDepartment of Physiology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Jennifer A Heckmann
Sharif A Taha
University of Utah · US

Funding

Appetitive/aversive encoding in the nucleus accumbensR21MH082325 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI TAHA, SHARIF A. · 2008 to 2009
$301k
NIMH NIH HHS MH-082325NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH082325
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infusion of a μ-opioid receptor (MOR) agonist into the nucleus accumbens (NAcc) drives voracious food intake, an effect hypothesized to occur through increased tastant palatability. While intake of many palatable foods is elevated by MOR stimulation, this manipulation has a preferential effect on fatty food ingestion. Consumption of high-fat foods is increased by NAcc MOR stimulation even in rats that prefer a carbohydrate-rich alternative under baseline conditions. This suggests that NAcc MOR stimulation may not simply potentiate palatability signals and raises the possibility that mechanisms mediating fat intake may be distinct from those underlying intake of other tastants. The present study was conducted to investigate the physiological mechanisms underlying the effects of NAcc MOR stimulation on fatty food intake. In experiment 1, we analyzed lick microstructure in rats ingesting Intralipid to identify the changes underlying feeding induced by infusion of a MOR-specific agonist into the NAcc. MOR stimulation in the NAcc core, but not shell, increased burst duration and first-minute licks, while simultaneously increasing the rate and duration of Intralipid ingestion. These results suggest that MOR activation in the core increases Intralipid palatability and attenuates inhibitory postingestive feedback. In experiment 2, we measured the effects of MOR stimulation in the NAcc core on consumption of nonnutritive olestra. A MOR-specific agonist dose dependently increased olestra intake, demonstrating that caloric signaling is not required for hyperphagia induced by NAcc MOR stimulation. Feeding induced by drug infusion in both experiments 1 and 2 was blocked by a MOR antagonist. In experiment 3, we determined whether MOR activation in the NAcc core could attenuate satiety-related signaling caused by infusion of the melanocortin agonist MTII into the third ventricle. Suppression of intake caused by MTII was reversed by MOR stimulation. Together, our results suggest that MOR stimulation in the NAcc core elevates fatty food intake through palatability mechanisms dependent on orosensory cues and suppression of satiety signals inhibiting food intake.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidAnimalsBehavior, AnimalDietary FatsEatingEnkephalin, Ala(2)-MePhe(4)-Gly(5)-Fatty AcidsFeeding BehaviorHyperphagiaMaleMelanocortinsModels, AnimalNucleus AccumbensRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReceptors, Opioid, muAnalgesics, OpioidDietary FatsEnkephalin, Ala(2)-MePhe(4)-Gly(5)-Fatty AcidsMelanocortinsReceptors, Opioid, muSucrosesucrose polyester

Identifiers

PMID21543633
PMCPMC3129872
OpenAlexW2136316251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.