ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2011
Identification of Toxoplasma gondii SUB1 antigen as a marker for acute infection by use of an innovative evaluation method.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification of novel biomarkers for anti-Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Mining the Proteome ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Review
- Identification of Oocyst-DrivenMicroorganisms · 2021Review
- Humoral immune responses in chickens and turkeys after infection with Toxoplasma gondii by using recombinant antigens.Parasitology research · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
By the separation of Toxoplasma lysate using two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and its analysis with human serum samples and mass spectrometry, the subtilisin-like protein (SUB1) was identified to be a potential marker for acute toxoplasmosis. Following expression of the C-terminal domain of SUB1 in Escherichia coli, it was tested in a line blot assay using a total of 80 human serum samples. Two computer programs based on different evaluation strategies were used for judgment of the line blot results: (i) a time-dependent method with a predefined cutoff value and (ii) a fixed-time-point method with a calculated cutoff. Thereby, SUB1 was proven to be rather reactive with specific immunoglobulin A (IgA), IgM, and IgG of patients with an acute infection. This finding makes this antigen an attractive candidate for improving diagnosis of toxoplasmosis and demonstrates that not only the selection of respective antigens but also the evaluation method chosen are important for the evaluation of new diagnostic markers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.