Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21543545›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of clinical nutrition2011

Food reinforcement, energy intake, and macronutrient choice.

Leonard H Epstein, Katelyn A Carr, Henry Lin, Kelly D Fletcher

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00962117 (Food Reinforcement Genotype Interactions and Eating), which is not on this map. Cited by 59 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00962117 completednot on this map

Food Reinforcement Genotype Interactions and Eating

TypeobservationalSponsorState University of New York at BuffaloRan2008 to 2011Enrolled310ConditionsObesity
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 116 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Energy compensation in response to aerobic exercise training in overweight adults.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2018
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Leonard H EpsteinDepartment of Pediatrics, University at Buffalo School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Buffalo, NY 14214-3000, USA. lhenet@buffalo.edu
Katelyn A Carr
Henry Lin
Kelly D Fletcher
University at Buffalo, State University of New York · US

Funding

Food reinforcement-genotype interactions and eatingR01DA024883 · NIDA · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI EPSTEIN, LEONARD H · 2007 to 2010
$997k
NIDA NIH HHS R01DA024883
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFood is a powerful reinforcer that motivates people to eat. The relative reinforcing value of food (RRV(food)) is associated with obesity and energy intake and interacts with impulsivity to predict energy intake.

objectiveHow RRV(food) is related to macronutrient choice in ad libitum eating tasks in humans has not been studied; however, animal research suggests that sugar or simple carbohydrates may be a determinant of reward value in food. This study assessed which macronutrients are associated with food reinforcement.

designTwo hundred seventy-three adults with various body mass indexes were assessed for RRV(food), the relative reinforcing value of reading, food hedonics, energy intake in an ad libitum taste test, and usual energy intake derived from repeated 24-h dietary recalls. Multiple regression was used to assess the relation between predictors of total energy and energy associated with macronutrient intake after control for age, sex, income, education, minority status, and other macronutrient intakes.

resultsThe results showed that the relative proportion of responding for food compared with reading (RRV(prop)) was positively related to body mass index, laboratory-measured energy intake, and usual energy intake. In addition, RRV(prop) was a predictor of sugar intake but not of total carbohydrate, fat, or protein intake.

conclusionThese results are consistent with basic animal research showing that sugar is related to food reward and with the hypothesis that food reward processes are more strongly related to eating than are food hedonics. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00962117.

Indexed as

Energy IntakeFoodReinforcement, PsychologyAdultBody Mass IndexFemaleFood PreferencesHumansMaleRegression Analysis

Identifiers

PMID21543545
PMCPMC3127525
OpenAlexW2100537881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.