Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21543339›Full record

ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2011

Methods and strategies for gene structure curation in WormBase.

G W Williams, P A Davis, A S Rogers, T Bieri, P Ozersky, J Spieth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The full-length transcriptome ofGenome research · 2020
    Article
  4. Benchmarks for measurement of duplicate detection methods in nucleotide databases.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2017
    Article
  5. Article
  6. WormBase 2014: new views of curated biology.Nucleic acids research · 2014
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Considerations for creating and annotating the budding yeast Genome Map at SGD: a progress report.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2012
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

G W WilliamsWormBase Group, The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambs, UK. gw3@sanger.ac.uk
P A Davis
A S Rogers
T Bieri
P Ozersky
J Spieth

Funding

Wormbase SupplementP41HG002223 · NHGRI · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI STERNBERG, PAUL WARREN · 2000 to 2012
$32.0M
Medical Research Council G0701197NHGRI NIH HHS P41 HG002223NHGRI NIH HHS P41-HG02223
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Caenorhabditis elegans genome sequence was published over a decade ago; this was the first published genome of a multi-cellular organism and now the WormBase project has had a decade of experience in curating this genome's sequence and gene structures. In one of its roles as a central repository for nematode biology, WormBase continues to refine the gene structure annotations using sequence similarity and other computational methods, as well as information from the literature- and community-submitted annotations. We describe the various methods of gene structure curation that have been tried by WormBase and the problems associated with each of them. We also describe the current strategy for gene structure curation, and introduce the WormBase 'curation tool', which integrates different data sources in order to identify new and correct gene structures. Database URL: http://www.wormbase.org/.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticAnimalsBase SequenceCaenorhabditis elegansComputational BiologyDNA, IntergenicGenes, HelminthHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMolecular Sequence AnnotationOpen Reading FramesDNA, Intergenic

Identifiers

PMID21543339
PMCPMC3092607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.