Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21542898›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2011

Breast tumors from CHEK2 1100delC-mutation carriers: genomic landscape and clinical implications.

Taru A Muranen, Dario Greco, Rainer Fagerholm, Outi Kilpivaara, Kati Kämpjärvi, Kristiina Aittomäki, Carl Blomqvist, Päivi Heikkilä, Ake Borg, Heli Nevanlinna

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Olfactory receptors and human diseases.Cell and tissue research · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Odorant receptors in cancer.BMB reports · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Taru A MuranenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 8, Helsinki, FI-00029, Finland.
Dario Greco
Rainer Fagerholm
Outi Kilpivaara
Kati Kämpjärvi
Kristiina Aittomäki
Carl Blomqvist
Päivi Heikkilä
Ake Borg
Heli Nevanlinna
Helsinki University Hospital · FIInstitute for Molecular Medicine Finland · FISkåne University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCheckpoint kinase 2 (CHEK2) is a moderate penetrance breast cancer risk gene, whose truncating mutation 1100delC increases the risk about twofold. We investigated gene copy-number aberrations and gene-expression profiles that are typical for breast tumors of CHEK2 1100delC-mutation carriers.

methodsIn total, 126 breast tumor tissue specimens including 32 samples from patients carrying CHEK2 1100delC were studied in array-comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) and gene-expression (GEX) experiments. After dimensionality reduction with CGHregions R package, CHEK2 1100delC-associated regions in the aCGH data were detected by the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. The linear model was fitted to GEX data with R package limma. Genes whose expression levels were associated with CHEK2 1100delC mutation were detected by the bayesian method.

resultsWe discovered four lost and three gained CHEK2 1100delC-related loci. These include losses of 1p13.3-31.3, 8p21.1-2, 8p23.1-2, and 17p12-13.1 as well as gains of 12q13.11-3, 16p13.3, and 19p13.3. Twenty-eight genes located on these regions showed differential expression between CHEK2 1100delC and other tumors, nominating them as candidates for CHEK2 1100delC-associated tumor-progression drivers. These included CLCA1 on 1p22 as well as CALCOCO1, SBEM, and LRP1 on 12q13. Altogether, 188 genes were differentially expressed between CHEK2 1100delC and other tumors. Of these, 144 had elevated and 44, reduced expression levels.Our results suggest the WNT pathway as a driver of tumorigenesis in breast tumors of CHEK2 1100delC-mutation carriers and a role for the olfactory receptor protein family in cancer progression. Differences in the expression of the 188 CHEK2 1100delC-associated genes divided breast tumor samples from three independent datasets into two groups that differed in their relapse-free survival time.

conclusionsWe have shown that copy-number aberrations of certain genomic regions are associated with CHEK2 mutation 1100delC. On these regions, we identified potential drivers of CHEK2 1100delC-associated tumorigenesis, whose role in cancer progression is worth investigating. Furthermore, poorer survival related to the CHEK2 1100delC gene-expression signature highlights pathways that are likely to have a role in the development of metastatic disease in carriers of the CHEK2 1100delC mutation.

Indexed as

MutationBayes TheoremBreast NeoplasmsCalcium-Binding ProteinsCarrier ProteinsCheckpoint Kinase 2Chloride ChannelsChromosomes, Human, Pair 1Comparative Genomic HybridizationFemaleGene DosageGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansLow Density Lipoprotein Receptor-Related Protein-1Protein Serine-Threonine KinasesSequence DeletionCalcium-Binding ProteinsCALCOCO1 protein, humanCarrier ProteinsCheckpoint Kinase 2CHEK2 protein, humanChloride ChannelsCLCA1 protein, humanLow Density Lipoprotein Receptor-Related Protein-1LRP1 protein, humanProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID21542898
PMCPMC3262202
OpenAlexW2137319707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.