Treatment of acute otitis media in children.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

1. Comparison of registered and published outcomes in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review.BMC medicine · 2015
   Pooled it
2. Contemporary concepts in management of acute otitis media in children.Otolaryngologic clinics of North America · 2014
   Review
3. Treating acute otitis media in young children: what constitutes success?The Pediatric infectious disease journal · 2013
   Article
4. Treatment of acute otitis media in young children.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2012
   Review

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Treatment of acute otitis media in children under 2 years of age.2011

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as