Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21541852›Full record

ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2011

Tomato fruit weight 11.3 maps close to fasciated on the bottom of chromosome 11.

Zejun Huang, Esther van der Knaap

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Reproductive Diversity in Cultivated Tomato (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Fine Mapping ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  8. A molecular framework forFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Identification of blossom-end rot loci using joint QTL-seq and linkage-based QTL mapping in tomato.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2021
    Article
  12. Pepper Fruit Elongation Is Controlled byFrontiers in plant science · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Tomato Fruit Development and Metabolism.Frontiers in plant science · 2019
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zejun HuangDepartment of Horticulture and Crop Science, The Ohio State University, 1680 Madison Avenue, Wooster, OH 44691, USA.
Esther van der Knaap

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fruit weight is an important character in many crops. In tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), fruit weight is controlled by many loci, some of which have a major effect on the trait. Fruit weight 11.3 (fw11.3) and fasciated (fas) have been mapped to the same region on chromosome 11. We sought to determine whether these loci represent alleles of the same or separate genes. We show that fas and fw11.3 are not allelic and instead represent separate genes. The fw11.3 locus was fine-mapped to a 149-kb region comprised of 22 predicted genes. Unlike most fruit weight loci, gene action at fw11.3 indicates that the mutant allele is partially dominant over the wild allele. We also investigate the nature of the genome rearrangement at the fas locus and demonstrate that the mutation is due to a 294-kb inversion disrupting the YABBY gene known to underlie the fas locus.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingChromosomes, PlantAllelesCrosses, GeneticDNA, PlantEvolution, MolecularFruitGene RearrangementGenes, PlantMutationPhenotypeQuantitative Trait LociSolanum lycopersicumDNA, Plant

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.