ArticleHerz2011
Opportunities and limitations of drug-coated balloons in interventional therapies.
Article in Herz, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Femoro-popliteal endovascular interventions.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2024Review
- Research progress of drug eluting balloon in arterial circulatory system.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Drug-eluting balloon: is it useful?The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2020Review
- Endovascular treatment of femoro-popliteal lesions.Clinical cardiology · 2019Review
- Compassionate use of a paclitaxel coated balloon in patients with refractory recurrent coronary in-stent restenosis.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2014Article
- Drug-coated balloons for treatment of coronary artery disease: updated recommendations from a consensus group.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2013Review
- Cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty and paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation for treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis in patients with stable coronary artery disease.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drug-coated balloons (DCB) represent a novel clinical treatment modality for coronary and peripheral artery disease. Advantages over standard angioplasty and stent technologies including homogeneous drug delivery to the vessel wall, immediate drug release without the use of a polymer, the option of using balloon catheters alone or in combination with a bare metal stent, no foreign object that remains in the body, the potential of reducing antiplatelet therapy, and lower restenosis rates in some indications. As with drug-eluting stents (DES), one cannot assume a class effect for DCB. So far, data from randomized clinical trials identify the treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis (ISR) and of de novo and restenotic lesions in peripheral artery disease as viable options. Furthermore, treatment of de novo lesions in small coronary vessels, bifurcation lesions, long lesions, pediatric interventions, and cerebrovascular applications are potential beneficial indications. In the coronary application, a strategy of DCB angioplasty with provisional spot-stenting in the case of severe dissections may become a better alternative in long and complex lesions, bifurcations, or in patients with contraindications for DES.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.