Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21541293›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

T cell chemo-vaccination effects after repeated mucosal SHIV exposures and oral pre-exposure prophylaxis.

Ellen N Kersh, Debra R Adams, Ae S Youngpairoj, Wei Luo, Qi Zheng, Mian-er Cong, Wutyi Aung, James Mitchell, Ron Otten, R Michael Hendry and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. New clinical trial designs for HIV vaccine evaluation.Current opinion in HIV and AIDS · 2013
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Advances in HIV microbicide development.Future medicinal chemistry · 2011
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ellen N KershDivision of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America. egk6@cdc.gov
Debra R Adams
Ae S Youngpairoj
Wei Luo
Qi Zheng
Mian-er Cong
Wutyi Aung
James Mitchell
Ron Otten
R Michael Hendry
Walid Heneine
Janet McNicholl
J Gerardo Garcia-Lerma
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with anti-viral drugs is currently in clinical trials for the prevention of HIV infection. Induction of adaptive immune responses to virus exposures during anti-viral drug administration, i.e., a "chemo-vaccination" effect, could contribute to PrEP efficacy. To study possible chemo-vaccination, we monitored humoral and cellular immune responses in nine rhesus macaques undergoing up to 14 weekly, low-dose SHIV(SF162P3) rectal exposures. Six macaques concurrently received PrEP with intermittent, oral Truvada; three were no-PrEP controls. PrEP protected 4 macaques from infection. Two of the four showed evidence of chemo-vaccination, because they developed anti-SHIV CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells; SHIV-specific antibodies were not detected. Control macaques showed no anti-SHIV immune responses before infection. Chemo-vaccination-induced T cell responses were robust (up to 3,940 SFU/10(6) PBMCs), predominantly central memory cells, short-lived (≤22 weeks), and appeared intermittently and with changing specificities. The two chemo-vaccinated macaques were virus-challenged again after 28 weeks of rest, after T cell responses had waned. One macaque was not protected from infection. The other macaque concurrently received additional PrEP. It remained uninfected and T cell responses were boosted during the additional virus exposures. In summary, we document and characterize PrEP-induced T cell chemo-vaccination. Although not protective after subsiding in one macaque, chemo-vaccination-induced T cells warrant more comprehensive analysis during peak responses for their ability to prevent or to control infections after additional exposures. Our findings highlight the importance of monitoring these responses in clinical PrEP trials and suggest that a combination of vaccines and PrEP potentially might enhance efficacy.

Indexed as

VaccinationAdministration, OralAnimalsCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCell DifferentiationCytokinesDeoxycytidineDrug CombinationsEmtricitabine, Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Drug CombinationEpitopesMacaca mulattaMaleMucous MembraneOrganophosphorus CompoundsSimian Acquired Immunodeficiency SyndromeCytokinesDeoxycytidineDrug CombinationsEmtricitabine, Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Drug CombinationEpitopesOrganophosphorus Compounds

Identifiers

PMID21541293
PMCPMC3082568
OpenAlexW1982793971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.