Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21541193›Full record

ReviewJournal of biomedicine & biotechnology2011

Quantifying tumor vascular heterogeneity with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: a review.

Xiangyu Yang, Michael V Knopp

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. DiffusionCT: Latent Diffusion Model for CT Image Standardization.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2023
    Article
  6. A review on advances inInsights into imaging · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Cross-Vendor CT Image Data Harmonization Using CVH-CT.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Radiomics in Kidney Cancer: MR Imaging.Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America · 2019
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Functional Parameters Derived from Magnetic Resonance Imaging Reflect Vascular Morphology in Preclinical Tumors and in Human Liver Metastases.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xiangyu YangDepartment of Radiology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Michael V Knopp

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor microvasculature possesses a high degree of heterogeneity in its structure and function. These features have been demonstrated to be important for disease diagnosis, response assessment, and treatment planning. The exploratory efforts of quantifying tumor vascular heterogeneity with DCE-MRI have led to promising results in a number of studies. However, the methodological implementation in those studies has been highly variable, leading to multiple challenges in data quality and comparability. This paper reviews several heterogeneity quantification methods, with an emphasis on their applications on DCE-MRI pharmacokinetic parametric maps. Important methodological and technological issues in experimental design, data acquisition, and analysis are also discussed, with the current opportunities and efforts for standardization highlighted.

Indexed as

Contrast MediaAnimalsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeoplasmsNeovascularization, PathologicContrast Media

Identifiers

PMID21541193
PMCPMC3085501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.