Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21540879›Full record

ArticleNature reviews. Genetics2011

The case for locus-specific databases.

Mark E Samuels, Guy A Rouleau

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Hybrid curation of gene-mutation relations combining automated extraction and crowdsourcing.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2014
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. How genetic variant libraries effectively extend gene testing patents: implications for intellectual property and good clinical care.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2012
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mark E SamuelsSte-Justine Hospital Research Center and Department of Medicine, University of Montreal, 3175 Cote Ste-Catherine, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Guy A Rouleau

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Locus-specific databases are the most useful repositories of the sequence information underlying medical genetic conditions and, for this reason, they need our continued support.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticAccess to InformationComputational BiologyCystic FibrosisGenetic VariationGenome, HumanHumansMutationPhenotypeSequence Analysis, DNAUnited KingdomUnited States

Identifiers

PMID21540879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.