Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21540864›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2011

Immunohistochemical and molecular analyses of HER2 status in breast cancers are highly concordant and complementary approaches.

J Lehmann-Che, F Amira-Bouhidel, E Turpin, M Antoine, H Soliman, L Legres, C Bocquet, R Bernoud, E Flandre, M Varna and 10 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Relationship betweenOncoTargets and therapy · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

J Lehmann-CheAP-HP, Hosp Saint-Louis, Department of Biochemistry, Paris 75010, France. jacqueline.lehmann-che@sls.aphp.fr
F Amira-Bouhidel
E Turpin
M Antoine
H Soliman
L Legres
C Bocquet
R Bernoud
E Flandre
M Varna
A de Roquancourt
L-F Plassa
S Giacchetti
M Espié
C de Bazelaire
L Cahen-Doidy
E Bourstyn
A Janin
H de Thé
P Bertheau
Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRHôpital Saint-Louis · FRInserm · FRSorbonne Paris Cité · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRHôpital Tenon · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH) are currently the most commonly used methods to assess HER2 status. PCR-based assays allow quantitative determination of HER2 amplification (Q-PCR) or overexpression (Q-RT-PCR), but are not routinely used. We evaluated the relevance of Q-RT-PCR for HER2 status determination.

methodsWe compared IHC and Q-RT-PCR in 466 breast tumours. In discordant or equivocal cases, five additional methods (IHC with two other antibodies, FISH, silver in situ hybridisation (SISH) and Q-PCR) were combined to determine HER2 status. Two cases with HER2 intra-tumour heterogeneity were further explored by allelic profiles analysis and HUMARA clonality determination after microdissection.

resultsWe observed 97.3% concordance between Q-RT-PCR and non-equivocal IHC. Twelve out of 466 cases (3%) revealed discordances between the two methods. The power of Q-RT-PCR to predict HER2 status (defined by seven methods) was similar to that of IHC. Although rare, some discordances between techniques might be due to HER2 intra-tumour heterogeneity and we report two examples, one tumour containing two distinct clones, another tumour consisting of HER2 amplified and non-amplified subclones.

conclusionQ-RT-PCR and IHC are highly concordant methods for HER2 status assessment, and Q-RT-PCR allows a highly reliable quantitative assessment and could be a useful adjunct to IHC.

Indexed as

AllelesGene DosageGenes, erbB-2HumansImmunohistochemistryIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceReceptors, AndrogenReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionReceptors, Androgen

Identifiers

PMID21540864
PMCPMC3111154
OpenAlexW1989720800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.