ArticleJAMA2011
Coronary revascularization trends in the United States, 2001-2008.
Article in JAMA, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04741035 (Effectiveness of Modified Sternal Precautions Versus Conventional Sternal Precautions in Improving Physical Function After Sternotomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 146 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effectiveness of Modified Sternal Precautions Versus Conventional Sternal Precautions in Improving Physical Function After Sternotomy
Who cites it
146 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Preoperative management of antiplatelet drugs for a coronary artery stent: how can we hit a moving target?BMC anesthesiology · 2014Pooled it
- Daily almond consumption in cardiovascular disease prevention via LDL-C change in the U.S. population: a cost-effectiveness analysis.BMC public health · 2020Trial
- Trial
- Large-scale experience with an anchorless vascular closure device in a real-life clinical setting.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2015Trial
- Hypothesis of Long-Term Outcome after Coronary Revascularization in Japanese Patients Compared to Multiethnic Groups in the US.PloS one · 2015Trial
- Patient preferences for coronary artery bypass graft surgery or percutaneous intervention in multivessel coronary artery disease.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2013Trial
- Public Reporting in Cardiothoracic Surgery: Does Transparency Improve Care?Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The Effects of Biomimetic Surface Topography on Vascular Cells: Implications for Vascular Conduits.Advanced healthcare materials · 2024Review
- Changes in treatment of intracranial aneurysms during the last decade in a large European neurovascular center.Acta neurochirurgica · 2024Observational
- Trends and Inhospital Outcomes of Intravascular Imaging on Single-Vessel Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion Treated With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.The American journal of cardiology · 2023Article
- Integrated biophysical matching of bacterial nanocellulose coronary artery bypass grafts towards bioinspired artery typical functions.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Recent Advances in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Techniques and Outcomes: A Narrative Review.Cureus · 2023Review
- Outcomes of Patients with Opioid-Related Diagnoses in Acute Coronary Syndrome: a National Inpatient Sample-Based Analysis.Journal of general internal medicine · 2023Article
- Intracoronary injection of nitroglycerine can prevent unnecessary percutaneous coronary intervention.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2022Article
- Defining value in cardiac surgery: A contemporary analysis of cost variation across the United States.JTCVS open · 2022Article
- Variations in Coronary Revascularization Practices and Their Effect on Long-Term Outcomes.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2022Article
- Tungsten disulfide nanotubes enhance flow-induced crystallization and radio-opacity of polylactide without adversely affecting in vitro toxicity.Acta biomaterialia · 2022Article
- Using machine learning to predict perfusionists' critical decision-making during cardiac surgery.Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering. Imaging & visualization · 2022Article
- Sex Differences in Characteristics, Treatments, and In-hospital Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Coronary Angiography or Intervention.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Prevalence and Mortality of Moderate or Severe Mitral Regurgitation Among Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With or Without Heart Failure: Results From CIN Study With 28,358 Patients.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
86 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
contextCoronary revascularization is among the most common hospital-based major interventional procedures performed in the United States. It is uncertain how new revascularization technologies, new clinical evidence from trials, and updated clinical guidelines have influenced the volume and distribution of coronary revascularizations over the past decade.
objectiveTo examine national time trends in the rates and types of coronary revascularizations. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: A serial cross-sectional study with time trends of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery or percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) between 2001 and 2008 at US hospitals in the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's Nationwide Inpatient Sample, which reports inpatient coronary revascularizations. These data were supplemented by Medicare outpatient hospital claims.
main outcome measuresAnnual procedure rates of coronary revascularizations, CABG surgery, and PCI.
resultsA 15% decrease (P < .001) in the annual rate of coronary revascularizations was observed from 2001-2002 to 2007-2008. The annual CABG surgery rate decreased steadily from 1742 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1663-1825) CABG surgeries per million adults per year in 2001-2002 to 1081 (95% CI, 1032-1133) CABG surgeries per million adults per year in 2007-2008 (P < .001), but PCI rates did not significantly change (3827 [95% CI, 3578-4092] PCI per million adults per year in 2001-2002 vs 3667 [95% CI, 3429-3922] PCI per million adults per year in 2007-2008, P = .74). Between 2001 and 2008, the number of hospitals in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample providing CABG surgery increased by 12% (212 in 2001 vs 241 in 2008, P = .03), and the number of PCI hospitals increased by 26% (246 in 2001 vs 331 in 2008, P < .001). The median CABG surgery caseload per hospital decreased by 28% (median [interquartile range], 253 [161-458] in 2001 vs 183 [98-292] in 2008; P < .001) and the number of CABG surgery hospitals providing fewer than 100 CABG surgeries per year increased from 23 (11%) in 2001 to 62 (26%) in 2008 (P < .001).
conclusionsIn US hospitals between 2001 and 2008, a substantial decrease in CABG surgery utilization rates was observed, but PCI utilization rates remained unchanged.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.