Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21540337›Full record

ArticleThe journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society2011

New application of the comet assay: chromosome--comet assay.

Elva I Cortés-Gutiérrez, Martha I Dávila-Rodríguez, José Luís Fernández, Carmen López-Fernández, Altea Gosálbez, Jaime Gosálvez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021
    Article
  4. Iranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPR · 2017
    Article
  5. DNA Damage in Euonymus japonicus Leaf Cells Caused by Roadside Pollution in Beijing.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2016
    Article
  6. A comprehensive review on clinical applications of comet assay.Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2015
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elva I Cortés-GutiérrezDivisión de Genética, Centro de Investigación Biomédica del Noreste, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Monterrey, México (EICG,MIDR). elvacortes@cibinmty.net
Martha I Dávila-Rodríguez
José Luís Fernández
Carmen López-Fernández
Altea Gosálbez
Jaime Gosálvez

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The comet assay is a well-established, simple, versatile, visual, rapid, and sensitive tool used extensively to assess DNA damage and DNA repair quantitatively and qualitatively in single cells. The comet assay is most frequently used to analyze white blood cells or lymphocytes in human biomonitoring studies, although other cell types have been examined, including buccal, nasal, epithelial, and placental cells and even spermatozoa. This study was conducted to design a protocol that can be used to generate comets in subnuclear units, such as chromosomes. The new technique is based on the chromosome isolation protocols currently used for whole chromosome mounting in electron microscopy, coupled to the alkaline variant of the comet assay, to detect DNA damage. The results show that migrant DNA fragments can be visualized in whole nuclei and isolated chromosomes and that they exhibit patterns of DNA migration that depend on the level of DNA damage produced. This protocol has great potential for the highly reproducible study of DNA damage and repair in specific chromosomal domains.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, HumanComet AssayDNA DamageDNA FragmentationHeLa CellsHumansMetaphase

Identifiers

PMID21540337
PMCPMC3201163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.