Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21540241›Full record

ArticleDisease models & mechanisms2011

Wild-type Drosophila melanogaster as an alternative model system for investigating the pathogenicity of Candida albicans.

Marcus T Glittenberg, Sukrit Silas, Donna M MacCallum, Neil A R Gow, Petros Ligoxygakis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Disease models & mechanisms, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Frontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Review
  4. Frontiers in immunology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Epithelial Infection WithFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Bioactive Peptides Against Fungal Biofilms.Frontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Review
  15. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2018
    Article
  16. Standardization ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Review
  17. Methodologies forMicrobial cell (Graz, Austria) · 2018
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Yeast-insect associations: It takes guts.Yeast (Chichester, England) · 2018
    Review
  20. Experimental in Vivo Models of Candidiasis.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marcus T GlittenbergGenes and Development Laboratory, Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3QU, UK.
Sukrit Silas
Donna M MacCallum
Neil A R Gow
Petros Ligoxygakis

Funding

Medical Research Council G0300170Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT080088Wellcome Trust WT087680MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Candida spp. are opportunistic pathogens in humans, and their systemic infections display upwards of 30% mortality in immunocompromised patients. Current mammalian model systems have certain disadvantages in that obtaining results is time consuming owing to the relatively long life spans and these results have low statistical resolution because sample sizes are usually small. We have therefore evaluated the potential of Drosophila melanogaster as an additional model system with which to dissect the host-pathogen interactions that occur during Candida albicans systemic infection. To do this, we monitored the survival of wild-type flies infected with various C. albicans clinical isolates that were previously ranked for murine virulence. From our lifetime data we computed two metrics of virulence for each isolate. These correlated significantly with murine survival, and were also used to group the isolates, and this grouping made relevant predictions regarding their murine virulence. Notably, differences in virulence were not predictably resolvable using immune-deficient spz(-/-) flies, suggesting that Toll signalling might actually be required to predictably differentiate virulence. Our analysis reveals wild-type D. melanogaster as a sensitive and relevant model system; one that offers immense genetic tractability (having an extensive RNA interference library that enables tissue-specific gene silencing), and that is easy to manipulate and culture. Undoubtedly, it will prove to be a valuable addition to the model systems currently used to study C. albicans infection.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsCandida albicansCandidiasisDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsGene Expression RegulationHumansMiceSurvival AnalysisVirulenceDrosophila Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21540241
PMCPMC3124057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.