Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21540202›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of the rheumatic diseases2011

Self-management of fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised controlled trial of group cognitive-behavioural therapy.

Sarah Hewlett, Nick Ambler, Celia Almeida, Alena Cliss, Alison Hammond, Karen Kitchen, Bev Knops, Denise Pope, Melissa Spears, Annette Swinkels and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 85 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
85citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

85 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 202 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Guideline
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Non-pharmacological interventions for fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  11. My treatment approach to rheumatoid arthritis.Mayo Clinic proceedings · 2012
    Guideline
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Article
  20. Article

25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah HewlettDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK. Sarah.Hewlett@uwe.ac.uk
Nick Ambler
Celia Almeida
Alena Cliss
Alison Hammond
Karen Kitchen
Bev Knops
Denise Pope
Melissa Spears
Annette Swinkels
Jon Pollock
University of the West of England · GBFrenchay Hospital · GBUniversity Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of Salford · GB

Funding

Arthritis Research UK 17340
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate the effect of group cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for fatigue self-management, compared with groups receiving fatigue information alone, on fatigue impact among people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

methodsTwo-arm, parallel randomised controlled trial in adults with RA, fatigue ≥ 6/10 (Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) 0-10, high bad) and no recent change in RA medication. Group CBT for fatigue self-management comprised six (weekly) 2 h sessions, and consolidation session (week 14). Control participants received fatigue self-management information in a 1 h didactic group session. Primary outcome at 18 weeks was the impact of fatigue measured using two methods (Multi-dimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF) 0-50; VAS 0-10), analysed using intention-to-treat analysis of covariance with multivariable regression models.

resultsOf 168 participants randomised, 41 withdrew before entry and 127 participated. There were no major baseline differences between the 65 CBT and 62 control participants. At 18 weeks CBT participants reported better scores than control participants for fatigue impact: MAF 28.99 versus 23.99 (adjusted difference -5.48, 95% CI -9.50 to -1.46, p=0.008); VAS 5.99 versus 4.26 (adjusted difference -1.95, 95% CI -2.99 to -0.90, p<0.001). Standardised effect sizes for fatigue impact were MAF 0.59 (95% CI 0.15 to 1.03) and VAS 0.77 (95% CI 0.33 to 1.21), both in favour of CBT. Secondary outcomes of perceived fatigue severity, coping, disability, depression, helplessness, self-efficacy and sleep were also better in CBT participants.

conclusionsGroup CBT for fatigue self-management in RA improves fatigue impact, coping and perceived severity, and well-being.

trial registrationISRCTN 32195100.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalAdultAgedArthritis, RheumatoidCognitive Behavioral TherapyFatigueFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychotherapy, GroupSelf CareSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID21540202
PMCPMC3086034
OpenAlexW2122740969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.