Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21539767›Full record

ArticleCanadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada

Undergraduate exposure to urology: impact of the distributed model of medical education in British Columbia.

Nathan A Hoag, Reza Hamidizadeh, Andrew E MacNeily

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Assessing Canadian medical students' confidence in undergraduate urologic training and preferences for teaching methods.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Teaching Urology to Undergraduates: A Prospective Survey of What General Practitioners Need to Know.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  4. Deficits in urological knowledge and skills among family medicine residents in Canada.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2020
    Article
  5. The current landscape of urological undergraduate education in Canada.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2020
    Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Urology - a specialty that will be faced by all future doctors.Advances in medical education and practice · 2016
    Article
  9. Undergraduate teaching of urology:Porto biomedical journal
    Article
  10. The value of a core clinical rotation in urology for medical students.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada
    Article
  11. Perception, career choice and self-efficacy of UK medical students and junior doctors in urology.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Teaching undergraduate urology: It takes a village.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nathan A HoagDepartment of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC.
Reza HamidizadehDepartment of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC.
Andrew E MacNeilyDepartment of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the increased development of distributed sites for medical education across Canada, it is imperative we ensure that the quality of education is comparable between the different campuses. Our objective was to assess medical student experience and comfort with common urologic clinical encounters and to determine whether any differences exist between the distributed education sites at the University of British Columbia (UBC).

methodsQuestionnaires assessing urologic education were delivered simultaneously to all final-year UBC medical students attending campuses in Vancouver, Victoria and Prince George. Results were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

resultsOverall, 55.8% of students felt their exposure to urology was adequate in the medical curriculum; learners in the Northern Program (Prince George) ranked their clinical and didactic experiences significantly higher. Areas requiring improvement include teaching of the male genitourinary exam, digital rectal exam and sexual history, in which learners rated teaching "good/outstanding" in only 18.2%, 47.7% and 43.2% of cases, respectively. Overall, students were most comfortable with the following clinical encounters: urinary tract infection, nephrolithiasis, benign prostatic hyperplasia, hematuria, incontinence and prostate cancer. Few differences in student experience or comfort were noted related to campus site, gender or urology clerkship exposure.

conclusionA significant minority of learners perceived that they had inadequate exposure to urology in the undergraduate curriculum. Experience in urology was comparable across the distributed sites and was congruent with teaching objectives. Students were comfortable with the clinical scenarios deemed most important in the literature. Learners in the Northern Program were significantly more satisfied with their urologic teaching, which potentially highlights the advantages of learning in a smaller academic setting.

Identifiers

PMID21539767
PMCPMC3650801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.