ArticleNeural development2011
Prospero and Pax2 combinatorially control neural cell fate decisions by modulating Ras- and Notch-dependent signaling.
Article in Neural development, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- MLE/DHX9 Helicase Activity Is Required to Regulate the Expression of a Number of Tissue-Specific Genes on Chromosome 4 in Drosophila melanogaster.Doklady. Biochemistry and biophysics · 2025Article
- Buffered EGFR signaling regulated by spitz-to-argos expression ratio is a critical factor for patterning the Drosophila eye.PLoS genetics · 2023Article
- Probing the conserved roles of cut in the development and function of optically different insect compound eyes.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023Article
- A comprehensive temporal patterning gene network in Drosophila medulla neuroblasts revealed by single-cell RNA sequencing.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Article
- Semper's cells in the insect compound eye: Insights into ocular form and function.Developmental biology · 2021Review
- Hexagonal patterning of the Drosophila eye.Developmental biology · 2021Review
- Enhancers with cooperative Notch binding sites are more resistant to regulation by the Hairless co-repressor.PLoS genetics · 2021Article
- Homothorax controls a binary Rhodopsin switch in Drosophila ocelli.PLoS genetics · 2021Article
- Müller Glia in Retinal Development: From Specification to Circuit Integration.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2021Review
- Identification of genomic enhancers through spatial integration of single-cell transcriptomics and epigenomics.Molecular systems biology · 2020Article
- Article
- cis-regulatory architecture of a short-range EGFR organizing center in the Drosophila melanogaster leg.PLoS genetics · 2018Article
- Degenerate Pax2 and Senseless binding motifs improve detection of low-affinity sites required for enhancer specificity.PLoS genetics · 2018Article
- Glass promotes the differentiation of neuronal and non-neuronal cell types in the Drosophila eye.PLoS genetics · 2018Article
- A Complex Lens for a Complex Eye.Integrative and comparative biology · 2017Article
- Multifunctional glial support by Semper cells in the Drosophila retina.PLoS genetics · 2017Article
- Eye Development inFrontiers in physiology · 2017Article
- dachshund Potentiates Hedgehog Signaling during Drosophila Retinogenesis.PLoS genetics · 2016Article
- Two temporal functions of Glass: Ommatidium patterning and photoreceptor differentiation.Developmental biology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe concept of an equivalence group, a cluster of cells with equal potential to adopt the same specific fate, has served as a useful paradigm to understand neural cell type specification. In the Drosophila eye, a set of five cells, called the 'R7 equivalence group', generates a single photoreceptor neuron and four lens-secreting epithelial cells. This choice between neuronal versus non-neuronal cell fates rests on differential requirements for, and cross-talk between, Notch/Delta- and Ras/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)-dependent signaling pathways. However, many questions remain unanswered related to how downstream events of these two signaling pathways mediate distinct cell fate decisions.
resultsHere, we demonstrate that two direct downstream targets of Ras and Notch signaling, the transcription factors Prospero and dPax2, are essential regulators of neuronal versus non-neuronal cell fate decisions in the R7 equivalence group. Prospero controls high activated MAPK levels required for neuronal fate, whereas dPax2 represses Delta expression to prevent neuronal fate. Importantly, activity from both factors is required for proper cell fate decisions to occur.
conclusionsThese data demonstrate that Ras and Notch signaling are integrated during cell fate decisions within the R7 equivalence group through the combinatorial and opposing activities of Pros and dPax2. Our study provides one of the first examples of how the differential expression and synergistic roles of two independent transcription factors determine cell fate within an equivalence group. Since the integration of Ras and Notch signaling is associated with many developmental and cancer models, these findings should provide new insights into how cell specificity is achieved by ubiquitously used signaling pathways in diverse biological contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.