Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21538816›Full record

ReviewBirth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology2011

Diabetic embryopathy: a role for the epigenome?

J Michael Salbaum, Claudia Kappen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Intrauterine Programming of Diabetes Induced Cardiac Embryopathy.Diabetes & obesity international journal · 2019
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The status of diabetic embryopathy.Upsala journal of medical sciences · 2016
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Responses of the embryonic epigenome to maternal diabetes.Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology · 2012
    Article
  13. Genetic and epigenomic footprints of folate.Progress in molecular biology and translational science · 2012
    Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J Michael SalbaumPennington Biomedical Research Center, 6400 Perkins Road, Baton Rouge, LA 70808, USA. michael.salbaum@pbrc.edu
Claudia Kappen
Pennington Biomedical Research Center · US

Funding

Research BaseP30DK072476 · NIDDK · LSU PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CTR · PI Peter Todd Katzmarzyk · 2005 to 2026
$26.5M
MOLECULAR MECHANISMS IN DIABETIC EMBRYOPATHYR01HD037804 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI KAPPEN, CLAUDIA T · 1998 to 2010
$2.5M
Neural tube defects in diabetic pregnancyR01HD055528 · NICHD · LSU PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CTR · PI SALBAUM, J MICHAEL · 2007 to 2011
$1.8M
NICHD NIH HHS HD055528NICHD NIH HHS HD37804NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD037804NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD055528NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK072476
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Embryonic development under adverse conditions, such as maternal diabetes or obesity during pregnancy, constitutes a major risk factor for birth defects, as well as for long-term health consequences and disease susceptibility in the offspring. While contributions from epigenetic changes have been invoked previously to explain the long-term changes in terms of developmental programming, we here review how maternal metabolism may directly affect the embryonic epigenome in relationship to teratogenic processes. We consider four epigenetic modalities--DNA methylation, non-coding RNA, transcription factors, and histone modifications--and their contribution to epigenetic memory, and discuss how epigenomic changes may mediate the altered control of embryonic gene expression brought about by maternal diabetes. In combination, the epigenomic modalities serve to define transcription-permissive domains of the genome, resulting in distinct epigenomic landscapes in different developmental cell types. We evaluate experimental approaches to characterize the epigenome in adverse pregnancy conditions, highlighting the role of next-generation sequencing on the technological side, while emphasizing the necessity to study defined cell populations in terms of biologic impact. Finally, we outline the challenges in moving from findings that correlate epigenomics to developmental phenotypes to scenarios that establish teratogenic causality.

Indexed as

Diabetes, GestationalGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalPregnancy in DiabeticsAnimalsDisease SusceptibilityEmbryo, MammalianEpigenesis, GeneticFemaleHumansPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID21538816
PMCPMC3152694
OpenAlexW2018461906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.