Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21538162›Full record

ArticleHerzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie2011

[Cardiac syncope : diagnosis and therapy].

J Seegers, M Zabel

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 61% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J SeegersAbteilung für Kardiologie und Pneumologie/Herzzentrum, Schwerpunkt Klinische Elektrophysiologie, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Deutschland. ukg@j-seegers.de
M Zabel
University of Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The second most frequent category of syncope is cardiac syncope. In contrast to syncope of noncardiac causes, the 1-year mortality of patients presenting with cardiac syncope without treatment is as high as 33%. Therefore, immediate diagnosis and treatment are necessary. Bradyarrhythmias or tachyarrhythmias are the most common causes of cardiac syncope. In many cases, an initial evaluation including history, physical examination, and electrocardiogram identifies the cause of syncope, so that specific treatment can be initiated immediately. In the remainder of cases, implantable loop recorders are useful to identify arrhythmias, while the presence or absence of structural cardiac disease is diagnosed by echocardiography. Syncope due to arrhythmias is typically treated with implantation of a pacemaker or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; treatment of syncope of other cardiac causes requires therapy of the underlying heart disease.

Indexed as

ElectrocardiographyArrhythmias, CardiacDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansHypotension, OrthostaticMedical History TakingPhysical ExaminationSyncope

Identifiers

PMID21538162
OpenAlexW2462550668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.