ArticlePlant cell reports2011
Isolation of a citrus promoter specific for reproductive organs and its functional analysis in isolated juice sacs and tomato.
Article in Plant cell reports, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Citrus Genetic Transformation: An Overview of the Current Strategies and Insights on the New Emerging Technologies.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Review
- Isolation of novel citrus and plum fruit promoters and their functional characterization for fruit biotechnology.BMC biotechnology · 2020Article
- Recent Advances of In Vitro Culture for the Application of New Breeding Techniques in Citrus.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Citrus carotenoid isomerase gene characterization by complementation of the "Micro-Tom" tangerine mutant.Plant cell reports · 2019Article
- Identification of a seed maturation protein gene from Coffea arabica (CaSMP) and analysis of its promoter activity in tomato.Plant cell reports · 2018Article
- Isolation, characterization, and evaluation of three Citrus sinensis-derived constitutive gene promoters.Plant cell reports · 2018Article
- Early-flowering sweet orange mutant 'x11' as a model for functional genomic studies of Citrus.BMC research notes · 2014Article
- Temporal and spatial control of gene expression in horticultural crops.Horticulture research · 2014Review
- Wheat chloroplast targeted sHSP26 promoter confers heat and abiotic stress inducible expression in transgenic Arabidopsis Plants.PloS one · 2013Article
- Genetic transformation of fruit trees: current status and remaining challenges.Transgenic research · 2012Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While searching for genes expressed in acid lemon but not in acidless lime pulp, we isolated clone Cl111 which showed the following expression phenotypes: (1) while it was expressed in the ovaries in both varieties, its mRNA was detected only in the pulp of the acid fruit, (2) no or very low expression of the gene was detected in vegetative organs. These expression patterns suggested that Cl111 is an ovary- and pulp-specific gene. The ability of ~2-kb fragments upstream of the transcription start site of the lemon and lime genes to confer reporter-gene activity was investigated by transient expression in isolated juice vesicles of both varieties. Whereas Cl111 promoter from lemon showed faint activity in lemon and lime juice vesicles, no activity was evident with the lime promoter. The activities of the 2-kb fragments and their delimited fragments were further investigated in tomato. The results indicated that the promoters were active in a manner similar to that in acid lemon and acidless lime: the lemon promoter generated activity in the fruit endocarp, analogous to citrus fruit pulp. The delimitation analyses identified an expression-conferring region which, in the lemon promoter, contained a sequence homologous to a fruit-specific element of the melon cucumisin gene. Another region, which reduced promoter activity, contained an I-Box-like sequence, identified as a fruit-specific negative element. Taken together, Cl111 promoter was confirmed to be pulp- and flower-specific. Differences in the expression of Cl111 between the two varieties could be attributable to changes in the gene promoter region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.