Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21538013›Full record

ReviewTechniques in coloproctology2011

The management of patients with primary chronic anal fissure: a position paper.

D F Altomare, G A Binda, S Canuti, V Landolfi, M Trompetto, R D Villani

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Techniques in coloproctology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04320498 (Effects of Platelet-rich Plasma in the Treatment of Chronic Anal Fissure), which is not on this map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04320498 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Platelet-rich Plasma in the Treatment of Chronic Anal Fissure

TypeinterventionalSponsorKTO Karatay UniversityRan2019 to 2021Enrolled41ConditionsAnal Fissure Chronic, PRPArmsprp injection, Anrecta, sitz bath, nutrition regulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 107 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [Chronic anal fissure-Cremes or surgery?]Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

D F AltomareDepartment of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University Aldo Moro, Policlinico, piazza G Cesare 11, 70124, Bari, Italy. altomare@clichiru.uniba.it
G A Binda
S Canuti
V Landolfi
M Trompetto
R D Villani
Ente Ospedaliero Ospedali Galliera · ITOspedale Civile di Voghera · ITUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · ITVilla Maria Hospital · UG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anal fissure is one of the most common and painful proctologic diseases. Its treatment has long been discussed and several different therapeutic options have been proposed. In the last decades, the understanding of its pathophysiology has led to a progressive reduction of invasive and potentially invalidating treatments in favor of conservative treatment based on anal sphincter muscle relaxation. Despite some systematic reviews and an American position statement, there is ongoing debate about the best treatment for anal fissure. This review is aimed at identifying the best treatment option drawing on evidence-based medicine and on the expert advice of 6 colorectal surgeons with extensive experience in this field in order to produce an Italian position statement for anal fissures. While there is little chance of a cure with conservative behavioral therapy, medical treatment with calcium channel blockers, diltiazem and nifepidine or glyceryl trinitrate, had a considerable success rate ranging from 50 to 90%. Use of 0.4% glyceryl trinitrate in standardized fashion seems to have the best results despite a higher percentage of headache, while the use of botulinum toxin had inconsistent results. Nonresponding patients should undergo lateral internal sphincterotomy. The risk of incontinence after this procedure seems to have been overemphasized in the past. Only a carefully selected group of patients, without anal hypertonia, could benefit from anoplasty.

Indexed as

Anal CanalBotulinum ToxinsCalcium Channel BlockersChronic DiseaseFissure in AnoHumansNitroglycerinVasodilator AgentsBotulinum ToxinsCalcium Channel BlockersNitroglycerinVasodilator Agents

Identifiers

PMID21538013
PMCPMC3099002
OpenAlexW2049111784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.