Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21537933›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2011

Well-done meat intake and meat-derived mutagen exposures in relation to breast cancer risk: the Nashville Breast Health Study.

Zhenming Fu, Sandra L Deming, Alecia M Fair, Martha J Shrubsole, Debra M Wujcik, Xiao-Ou Shu, Mark Kelley, Wei Zheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The potential contribution of dietary factors to breast cancer prevention.European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP) · 2017
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Diet and risk of breast cancer.Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland) · 2016
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Genetic polymorphisms associated with breast cancer in malaysian cohort.Indian journal of clinical biochemistry : IJCB · 2015
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zhenming FuDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, 2525 West End Avenue, 8th floor, Suite 800, Nashville, TN 37203-1738, USA.
Sandra L Deming
Alecia M Fair
Martha J Shrubsole
Debra M Wujcik
Xiao-Ou Shu
Mark Kelley
Wei Zheng
Vanderbilt University · USMeharry Medical College · US

Funding

Tumor Immunology and Microenvironment Research ProgramP30CA068485 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI MATTHEW J TYSKA · 1995 to 2026
$172.8M
TrainingU54CA163072 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Karen Marie Winkfield · 2011 to 2026
$20.1M
The Nashville Breast Health StudyR01CA100374 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI ZHENG, WEI · 2004 to 2009
$4.2M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA068485NCI NIH HHS P30CA68485NCI NIH HHS R01 CA100374NCI NIH HHS R01CA100374NCI NIH HHS U54 CA163072
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies of the association of meat intake and meat-derived mutagen exposure with breast cancer risk have produced inconsistent results. We evaluated this association in a population-based case-control study of incident breast cancer conducted in Nashville, Tennessee, United States, including 2,386 breast cancer cases and 1,703 healthy women controls. Telephone interviews were conducted to obtain information related to meat intake including amount, cooking methods, and doneness levels, as well as other known or hypothesized risk factors for breast cancer. Unconditional logistic regression was used to derive odds ratios (ORs) after adjusting for potential confounders. High intake of red meat was associated with a significantly elevated risk of breast cancer (P-trend < 0.001). The association was particularly strong for high intake of well-done red meat (P-trend < 0.001), with an adjusted OR of 1.5 (95% CI = 1.3-1.9) for the highest versus the lowest quartile. Associations between red meat and breast cancer risk were slightly stronger for postmenopausal women than for premenopausal women. Meat-derived mutagens such as 2-amino-3,8-dimethylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoxaline and 2-amino-3,4,8-trimethylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoxaline, were significantly associated with increased breast cancer risk among postmenopausal women only (P-trend = 0.002 and 0.003, respectively). The results from this study provide strong support for the hypotheses that high red meat intake and meat-derived mutagen exposure may be associated with an increase in breast cancer risk.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsCarcinogensCase-Control StudiesCookingEatingFemaleHumansMeatMiddle AgedMutagensPostmenopausePremenopauseQuinoxalinesRegression Analysis2-amino-3,7,8-trimethylimidazo(4,5-f)quinoxaline2-amino-3,8-dimethylimidazo(4,5-f)quinoxalineCarcinogensMutagensQuinoxalines

Identifiers

PMID21537933
PMCPMC3775710
OpenAlexW2060148688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.