Trial reportInternational journal of clinical oncology2011
Surrogacy of tumor response and progression-free survival for overall survival in metastatic breast cancer resistant to both anthracyclines and taxanes.
Trial report in International journal of clinical oncology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Clinical significance of post-progression survival in lung cancer.Thoracic cancer · 2017Review
- Strength of Validation for Surrogate End Points Used in the US Food and Drug Administration's Approval of Oncology Drugs.Mayo Clinic proceedings · 2016Article
- Progression-free survival as a potential surrogate for overall survival in metastatic breast cancer.OncoTargets and therapy · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn breast cancer, the validity of surrogate endpoints for overall survival (OS) is a matter of controversy.
methodsIn order to generate a hypothesis, we evaluated whether tumor response or progression-free survival (PFS) could be valid surrogates for OS in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Data from 30 patients were available from a phase II study of trastuzumab and capecitabine in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer resistant to both anthracyclines and taxanes. The proportional hazards (PH) model was applied to evaluate the relationship between OS and tumor response or PFS. In addition, to explore prognostic factors influencing OS or post-progression survival, the PH model with a stepwise regression procedure was applied.
resultsThe relationship between tumor response and PFS was highly significant (P = 0.0036); however, there was no significant relationship between tumor response and OS or between PFS and OS. In the multivariate analysis, the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions (P = 0.0011), neutrophil count (P = 0.0033), and creatinine (P = 0.0085) were statistically significantly associated with OS.
conclusionWe generated a hypothesis that neither PFS nor tumor response were valid as surrogate endpoints for OS, at least in the phase II trial for metastatic breast cancer resistant to both anthracyclines and taxanes. We also found that the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, neutrophil count, and creatinine were prognostic factors for OS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.