ArticleInternational journal of molecular epidemiology and genetics2010
Using In silico LD clumping and meta-analysis of genome-wide datasets as a complementary tool to investigate and validate new candidate biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease.
Article in International journal of molecular epidemiology and genetics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Post-GWAS Analysis of the Shared Genetic Architecture Between COVID-19 and Coronary Artery Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- A genome-wide association study for recurrent laryngeal neuropathy in the Thoroughbred horse identifies a candidate gene that regulates myelin structure.Equine veterinary journal · 2025Article
- Exonic mutations in cell-cell adhesion may contribute to CADASIL-related CSVD pathology.Human genetics · 2023Article
- Amyloid precursor protein (APP) and amyloid β (Aβ) interact with cell adhesion molecules: Implications in Alzheimer's disease and normal physiology.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Review
- Human amyloid-β enriched extracts: evaluation of in vitro and in vivo internalization and molecular characterization.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the recent wealth of genome-wide association studies, insufficient power may explain why much of the heritable contribution to common diseases remains hidden. As different SNP panels are genotyped by commercial chips, increasing study power through meta-analysis is made problematic. To address these power issues we suggest an approach which permits meta-analysis of candidate SNPs from multiple GWAS. By identifying correlated SNPs from different platforms (r(2)=1), using PLINK's 'clumping' method, we generated combined p-values (using Fisher's combined and random effects meta-analysis) for each clump. P-values were corrected for the number of clumps (representing the number of independent tests). We also explored to what extent commercial platforms tag HapMap SNPs within these candidate genes. To illustrate this approach, and to serve as 'proof-of-principle', we used 3 late-onset Alzheimer's disease GWAS datasets to explore SNP-disease associations in 4 new candidate genes encoding cerebro-spinal fluid biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease; Fibrinogen γ-chain (FGG), SPARC-like1 (SPARCL1), Contactin-1 (CNTN1) and Contactin-2 (CNTN2). Genes encoding current Alzheimer's biomarkers; APP (Aβ), MAPT (Tau) and APOE were also included. This method identified two SNP 'clumps'; one clump in APOE (rs4420638) and one downstream of CNTN2 (which harboured rs7523477 and rs4951168) which were significant following random effects meta-analysis (P < 0.05). The latter was linked to three conserved SNPs in the 3'-UTR of CNTN2. We cannot rule out that this result is a false positive due to the large number of statistical tests applied; nevertheless this approach is easily applied and might well have utility in future '-omics' studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21537386PMC3076759What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.