Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21537010›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2011

Induction of efflux-mediated macrolide resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Scott T Chancey, Xiaoliu Zhou, Dorothea Zähner, David S Stephens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. A Review of the Resistance Mechanisms forMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. The Role of Proteomics in Bacterial Response to Antibiotics.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Resistance to Macrolide Antibiotics in Public Health Pathogens.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2016
    Review
  14. Macrolide Resistance inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2016
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Scott T ChanceyDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, USA.
Xiaoliu Zhou
Dorothea Zähner
David S Stephens
Emory University · US

Funding

Molecular bssis of mef-mediated antibiotic resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniaeR01AI070829 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI STEPHENS, DAVID S · 2007 to 2010
$1.5M
NIAID NIH HHS 5R01AI070829NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI070829
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The antimicrobial efflux system encoded by the operon mef(E)-mel on the mobile genetic element MEGA in Streptococcus pneumoniae and other Gram-positive bacteria is inducible by macrolide antibiotics and antimicrobial peptides. Induction may affect the clinical response to the use of macrolides. We developed mef(E) reporter constructs and a disk diffusion induction and resistance assay to determine the kinetics and basis of mef(E)-mel induction. Induction occurred rapidly, with a >15-fold increase in transcription within 1 h of exposure to subinhibitory concentrations of erythromycin. A spectrum of environmental conditions, including competence and nonmacrolide antibiotics with distinct cellular targets, did not induce mef(E). Using 16 different structurally defined macrolides, induction was correlated with the amino sugar attached to C-5 of the macrolide lactone ring, not with the size (e.g., 14-, 15- or 16-member) of the ring or with the presence of the neutral sugar cladinose at C-3. Macrolides with a monosaccharide attached to C-5, known to block exit of the nascent peptide from the ribosome after the incorporation of up to eight amino acids, induced mef(E) expression. Macrolides with a C-5 disaccharide, which extends the macrolide into the ribosomal exit tunnel, disrupting peptidyl transferase activity, did not induce it. The induction of mef(E) did not require macrolide efflux, but the affinity of macrolides for the ribosome determined the availability for efflux and pneumococcal susceptibility. The induction of mef(E)-mel expression by inducing macrolides appears to be based on specific interactions of the macrolide C-5 saccharide with the ribosome that alleviate transcriptional attenuation of mef(E)-mel.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialMacrolidesMicrobial Sensitivity TestsStreptococcus pneumoniaeAnti-Bacterial AgentsMacrolides

Identifiers

PMID21537010
PMCPMC3122420
OpenAlexW2172101654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.