Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21536839›Full record

ReviewThe Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry2011

Astrocytes as regulators of synaptic function: a quest for the Ca2+ master key.

Dmitri A Rusakov, Kaiyu Zheng, Christian Henneberger

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Glial evolution as a determinant of human behavior and its disorders.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2020
    Review
  5. Astrocytic Calcium Dynamics Along the Pain Pathway.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2020
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Monitoring CaBrain research bulletin · 2018
    Article
  11. Astrocytic Atrophy FollowingFrontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dmitri A RusakovUCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK. d.rusakov@ion.ucl.ac.uk
Kaiyu Zheng
Christian Henneberger
University College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0802216Medical Research Council G0802216(89644)Medical Research Council G0900613Medical Research Council G0900613(91064)Wellcome Trust 084311
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emerging role of astrocytes in neural communication represents a conceptual challenge. In striking contrast to the rapid and highly space- and time-constrained machinery of neuronal spike propagation and synaptic release, astroglia appear slow and imprecise. Although a large body of independent experiments documents active signal exchange between astrocytes and neurons, some genetic models have raised doubts about the major Ca2+ -dependent molecular mechanism routinely associated with release of "gliotransmitters." A limited understanding of astrocytic Ca2+ signaling and the imperfect compatibility between physiology and experimental manipulations seem to have contributed to this conceptual bottleneck. Experimental approaches providing mechanistic insights into the diverse mechanisms of intra-astrocyte Ca2+ signaling on the nanoscale are needed to understand Ca2+ -dependent astrocytic function in vivo. This review highlights limitations and potential advantages of such approaches from the current methodological perspective.

Indexed as

AnimalsAstrocytesCalciumCalcium SignalingCell CommunicationHumansNeuronal PlasticityNeuronsSynapsesSynaptic TransmissionCalcium

Identifiers

PMID21536839
PMCPMC3374854
OpenAlexW2004497217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.