Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21536455›Full record

Trial reportWomen's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health

Improving women's preconceptional health: long-term effects of the Strong Healthy Women behavior change intervention in the central Pennsylvania Women's Health Study.

Carol S Weisman, Marianne M Hillemeier, Danielle Symons Downs, Mark E Feinberg, Cynthia H Chuang, John J Botti, Anne-Marie Dyer

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Rural maternal health interventions: A scoping review and implications for best practices.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2025
    Article
  10. Factors associated with early gestational weight gain among women with pre-pregnancy overweight or obesity.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Gestational Weight Gain in Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Controlled Study.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Carol S WeismanPennsylvania State University, College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA. cweisman@psu.edu
Marianne M Hillemeier
Danielle Symons Downs
Mark E Feinberg
Cynthia H Chuang
John J Botti
Anne-Marie Dyer

Funding

Unintended Pregnancy in Women with Chronic Medical ConditionsK23HD051634 · NICHD · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI CHUANG, CYNTHIA H · 2006 to 2010
$721k
NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD051634
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the long-term (6- and 12-month) effects of the Strong Healthy Women intervention on health-related behaviors, weight and body mass index (BMI), and weight gain during pregnancy. Strong Healthy Women is a small-group behavioral intervention for pre- and interconceptional women designed to modify key risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes; pretest-posttest findings from a randomized, controlled trial have been previously reported. The following questions are addressed: 1) were significant pretest-posttest changes in health-related behaviors (previously reported) maintained over the 12-month follow-up period; 2) did the intervention impact weight and BMI over the 12-month follow-up period; and 3) did the intervention impact pregnancy weight gain for those who gave birth during the follow-up period?

methodsData are from 6- and 12-month follow-up telephone interviews of women in the original trial of the Strong Healthy Women intervention (n = 362) and from birth records for singleton births (n = 45) during the 12-month follow-up period. Repeated measures regression was used to evaluate intervention effects. MAIN

findingsAt the 12-month follow-up, participants in the Strong Healthy Women intervention were significantly more likely than controls to use a daily multivitamin with folic acid and to have lower weight and BMI. The intervention's effect on reading food labels for nutritional values dropped off between the 6- and 12-month follow-up. Among those who gave birth to singletons during the follow-up period, women who participated in the intervention had lower average pregnancy weight gain compared with controls. Although the intervention effect was no longer significant when controlling for pre-pregnancy obesity, the adjusted means show a trend toward lower weight gain in the intervention group.

conclusionThese findings provide important evidence that the Strong Healthy Women behavior change intervention is effective in modifying important risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes and may improve an important pregnancy outcome, weight gain during pregnancy. Because the intervention seems to help women manage their weight in the months after the intervention and during pregnancy, it may be an effective obesity prevention strategy for women before, during, and after the transition to motherhood.

Indexed as

Behavior TherapyHealth BehaviorPreconception CarePrenatal CareAdultBody Mass IndexBody WeightFemaleFolic AcidFollow-Up StudiesFood LabelingHealth PromotionHumansInterviews as TopicObesityPennsylvaniaFolic AcidVitamins

Identifiers

PMID21536455
PMCPMC3707004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.