Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21534609›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2011

Predictive power of molecular dynamics receptor structures in virtual screening.

Sara E Nichols, Riccardo Baron, Anthony Ivetac, J Andrew McCammon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Molecular Dynamics as a Tool for Virtual Ligand Screening.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Molecular Structure-Based Screening of the Constituents ofCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Decrypting a Cryptic Allosteric Pocket inCommunications chemistry · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Application ofFrontiers in chemistry · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Knowledge-Based Methods To Train and Optimize Virtual Screening Ensembles.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2016
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sara E NicholsDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-0365, United States. senichols@ucsd.edu
Riccardo Baron
Anthony Ivetac
J Andrew McCammon

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular dynamics (MD) simulation is a well-established method for understanding protein dynamics. Conformations from unrestrained MD simulations have yet to be assessed for blind virtual screening (VS) by docking. This study presents a critical analysis of the predictive power of MD snapshots to this regard, evaluating two well-characterized systems of varying flexibility in ligand-bound and unbound configurations. Results from such VS predictions are discussed with respect to experimentally determined structures. In all cases, MD simulations provide snapshots that improve VS predictive power over known crystal structures, possibly due to sampling more relevant receptor conformations. Additionally, MD can move conformations previously not amenable to docking into the predictive range.

Indexed as

Molecular Dynamics SimulationUser-Computer InterfaceCytochrome-c PeroxidaseDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalHIV-1HIV Reverse TranscriptaseProtein ConformationProteinsReverse Transcriptase InhibitorsROC CurveCytochrome-c PeroxidaseHIV Reverse TranscriptaseProteinsReverse Transcriptase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID21534609
PMCPMC3124922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.